That's what they tell me but I haven't noticed.
Feb 28, 2002 #1 C Chuck 98 RT/10 Enthusiast Joined Oct 15, 2000 Posts 17,923 Reaction score 0 Location tampa, fl USA That's what they tell me but I haven't noticed.
Feb 28, 2002 #2 OP OP C Chuck 98 RT/10 Enthusiast Joined Oct 15, 2000 Posts 17,923 Reaction score 0 Location tampa, fl USA . <FONT COLOR="#ff0000" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">This message has been edited by Chuck 98 RT/10 on 02-28-2002 at 09:07 PM</font>
. <FONT COLOR="#ff0000" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">This message has been edited by Chuck 98 RT/10 on 02-28-2002 at 09:07 PM</font>
Feb 28, 2002 #3 M MES Enthusiast Joined Feb 6, 2001 Posts 1,024 Reaction score 0 Location Sarasota, Florida They both have poor aerodynamics it's just the RT/10 is worse GTS Drag Coefficient 0.35 RT/10 Drag Coefficient 0.495 (top off) 0.46 (soft top) 0.45 (hard top)
They both have poor aerodynamics it's just the RT/10 is worse GTS Drag Coefficient 0.35 RT/10 Drag Coefficient 0.495 (top off) 0.46 (soft top) 0.45 (hard top)
