Ron,
I think you would be find either way, but two issues not addressed are the fact that you have to drive to each track & the 315s' will be a pain in the butt. The other item for review , is
that with 2.9 degrees in front, you could eat up your tires just driving from track to track. Whereas this works pretty good for on the track, I would hesitate to drive on the street/highway for long distances , as I would expect weird tire wear. Just my thoughts, but I would back down to 2.0 neg. in front, 1.5 in the rear, and go with the 295s. My reasoning is the tires have to last, they won't wander as bad when on the highway, and steering response would be better with the smaller tire, which is still two sizes larger than stock. Have fun !!!
I think you would be find either way, but two issues not addressed are the fact that you have to drive to each track & the 315s' will be a pain in the butt. The other item for review , is
that with 2.9 degrees in front, you could eat up your tires just driving from track to track. Whereas this works pretty good for on the track, I would hesitate to drive on the street/highway for long distances , as I would expect weird tire wear. Just my thoughts, but I would back down to 2.0 neg. in front, 1.5 in the rear, and go with the 295s. My reasoning is the tires have to last, they won't wander as bad when on the highway, and steering response would be better with the smaller tire, which is still two sizes larger than stock. Have fun !!!