RockyTop
Enthusiast
My co-corker (a Porsche Boxster owner and P-car fan) and I are having a good-natured argument over whether the GT II driven on a track (other than the old Nurburgring) by an experienced driver would beat a slightly modified ACR (headers, exhaust and brakes).
We started this over an article where a P-car racer drove a stock GT II and a stock ACR at Thunderhill and the GTII won by driving laps just under 2 minutes (which I interpret to be 2 minutes or they would have said 1:59 or 1:58 etc.). The ACR ran in the 2:04s. No mention whether he had much Viper druiving experience.
I looked at the Viper Days times there and see that the top racers ran in the 1:55s. Consequently, I argue that a slighly modified ACR (isn't that basically what the Viper Days GTI cars are - - shod with Hoosiers or slicks ?) was driven on the same track at times 4-5 seconds faster. I conclude, that even taking away 3-4 seconds for Hoosiers, it's at worst a dead heat for the ACR. I then note that the mag driver currently campaigns a Porsche 911 in a professional series. Put a ptofessional Viper driver in the ACR (e.g., Tommy Archer) and the laps times get even lower for the ACR.
He says I am off my rocker because you cannot compare the lap times due to potentially varying trak condiitons. I retort that shoprt of ice or rain (no mention of these in the mag article), no track condition is gonna amout to 4-5 seconds difference. And so it goes... Any thoughts ?
We started this over an article where a P-car racer drove a stock GT II and a stock ACR at Thunderhill and the GTII won by driving laps just under 2 minutes (which I interpret to be 2 minutes or they would have said 1:59 or 1:58 etc.). The ACR ran in the 2:04s. No mention whether he had much Viper druiving experience.
I looked at the Viper Days times there and see that the top racers ran in the 1:55s. Consequently, I argue that a slighly modified ACR (isn't that basically what the Viper Days GTI cars are - - shod with Hoosiers or slicks ?) was driven on the same track at times 4-5 seconds faster. I conclude, that even taking away 3-4 seconds for Hoosiers, it's at worst a dead heat for the ACR. I then note that the mag driver currently campaigns a Porsche 911 in a professional series. Put a ptofessional Viper driver in the ACR (e.g., Tommy Archer) and the laps times get even lower for the ACR.
He says I am off my rocker because you cannot compare the lap times due to potentially varying trak condiitons. I retort that shoprt of ice or rain (no mention of these in the mag article), no track condition is gonna amout to 4-5 seconds difference. And so it goes... Any thoughts ?