My Dad owns a 2001 Mulholland Edition Prowler that I will purchase from him when he's ready to sell it to me. I Love that car! I love my Viper way more, but it has its usefullness at times. I don't expect it to do anything other than look pretty and be reliable. (same 3.5 V6 I had in my 300M that served me well for 213k miles and get this: was on its original transmission!) Yes, a HEMI from the SRT8 would have made that thing a rocketship, however that wasn't its purpose. (like the GNX being faster than a vette; which meant execs had to kill it)
As for the Chevy SSR, I like them too! They weren't for hauling stuff like rocks or blocks, but if you were headed to the beach and were bringing tubes and towels and a picnic basket and cooler, it was perfect!
The Excursion shows just how stupid the writer of the article is.....I hope someday when he's out driving around in his Toyota Prius that he doesn't run a red light in front of an Excursion cause in a brief instant he'll understand one of many reasons someone would buy one: If your wife and kids are in it and they hit a Prius, you're fixing the bumper, some lights and paint....and the Prius and its driver are crushed like a pop can and sent for recycling.
Yes, the Aztec, that X90, the Gremlin, the Pacer should all be on there. If he had any brains he'd have included the Edsel as that was the model for such an article. I agree the fastback Monte Carlo SS and Pontiac 2+2 were forgettable as well, but weren't those meant for nascar dominance? (like the Superbird and Torino GT) If so, they weren't design duds, they were ingenious relics created for the public to consume just enough of to allow them to be racing legal.
Other design duds I'd have put on the list:
- the Grand Wagoneer of the mid 80's
- the Matador
Regards,
Aaron