I went to the Dallas Auto Show, just to see if it looked better in person. AND IT DOES!!! I was definitely disappointed in the pics we had all seen, very much so, in fact. However, when you see it in person, there is no way you can make camaro/spyder/s2000 comparisons. Those other cars were at the same show, and they are definitely not in the same league. Did it attract the same attention as the original R/T did in '89? No. Has the *****'s expectations changed since then? Absolutely. Is that a fair excuse? MMMM...Maybe.
After checking out the 2003, I went to the section where the "older" cars were being shown. There were 3 R/Ts there, '96-'00. Suddenly, they looked a little less then new. Maybe it's because I've seen them so many times, but if I had to choose right now just on looks alone.... 2003.
Keep in mind that if you prefer the GTS w/stripes over the R/T, then you can't try to compare the 2003 to them. The only fair comparison is between R/Ts. With that in mind, I would have to say that it is a draw. If you take the 10+ years into consideration then the Gen I wins, otherwise the Gen III does.
I can't believe I'm saying this, considering how I thought BEFORE I went to the show, but you have to see it in person before you can judge it. You still may prefer the current R/T, but it will definitely be a lot closer. The more I think about it, it would have been impossible for Dodge to wow us as much this time as they did when the Viper was first introduced.