B&M or Hurst?

[Warfang]

Been looking to changing my shifter for a while now, but haven't had a definitive answer. Which is better or what's the difference between the two? The B&M seems better made, but that's just judging the book by it's cover.

 

[Don]

Went with the Hurst, but have no experience with the other. To each his own, but I'm happy. Get whichever one you want as I don't believe there is a clear better choice here.

 

[sparty116]

I have the Hurst and like it very much, nice short throw, but it has a different thread pattern and a MGW shift knob will not fit. Other than that it has been one of the best upgrades that I did. No more scary 2-3 shifts because the springs are much stiffer and pulls the shifter over.

 

[TOOOFST]

B&M works fine for dozen's of 10 second passes.

 

[Warfang]

See what I mean? Nothing definitive. I'm sure they are both good products. I just wonder if one might be better suited for specific types of driving or drivers.

 

[99 R/T 10]

I don't think you can go wrong either way. They are both designed to give you a shorter, more positive shift.

 

[A1998]

Not sure what MGW knob you have, but I just installed a Hurst shifter and my MGW knob fit perfectly!!

A1998

 

[01sapphireGTS]

The Hurst is what comes stock when you purchase a Competition Coupe and has recently been made available to the public.

http://mopar.com/street/whatshot1004.htm

I would think folks like Tator could get a good price on one for you.

 

[diabolos88]

ive had svs and the b&m. svs is too notchy and hard to get into reverse. b&m is smooth a hell, i might try the hurst, just to chek it out.

 

[Warfang]

any pics of ater install?

 

[Warfang]

Just found an older post by The Wizard and he says the Hurst is better than B&M by far. I do what the Wizard says.