Matt Houston
Enthusiast
CNBC is calling Chrysler's new electric sportscar an electric Viper. What do you think?
if the production model held true to this form, bc of its close appearance to our favorite sports car I would totally own one just to have it parked next to my girl in the garrage. Hopefully this will make the gas haters back off our HP hog just for giving back to the environment as if getting 13 and 23 miles to the gallon for 08 wasnt good enough.
Just saw a commercial on TV. "Toyota - Champions of the Enviroment" ***???
Have they invented a car that runs on Carbon Monoxide? Spits out Oxygen and Diamonds?
Ted
When you consider the whole cycle with one of these things (power plant, tx lines, house, charger, batteries, motor), you're talking about 30% of the efficiency of a gasoline-powered vehicle. Unless the grid is mostly nuclear, you're polluting more by driving your electric car.
Gasoline is a bargain at double the price, and until we see $10/gal gas, it won't be financially worth pursuing anything else.
That said, I think the answer is nuclear power used to produce methanol, simply because the infrastructure to distribute it is there, people are accustomed to dealing with liquid fuels, and most cars out there today could be converted to run on it. You can't get close to the energy density of chemical fuels with batteries or even the carbon-nanotube ultracapacitors I worked on at MIT.
Yep, Totally aggree with you on that point. One other point to think about with battery power is there lifespan! How much of the power packs would be re-cycleableNo doubt it will take awhile to solve this energy problem and global warming but, for every theory created it leads to more ideas. We should be glad that Chrysler engineering is competeing with Toyota and others. Competition creates better things.
Come to the United Kingdom, were there now with our Gas prices!!!!!!!Gasoline is a bargain at double the price, and until we see $10/gal gas, it won't be financially worth pursuing anything else.