HasCars
Enthusiast
Hello everyone. Owner of 1992 Viper #207, 3300 miles. I have listed it on BringATrailer.com but they refuse to call it Viper #207 because they do not feel they can verify the sequences. My serial number is 1B3BR65E3NV100207 and its a 1992, but they say:
" Thank you for sending over your change requests, and I hope the following will adequately address them. Our formatting will not accommodate your request to add “#207” to the headline, as we need to keep those as concise as possible, and the number 207 doesn’t really distinguish the car from the other 1992 Vipers. As for the number 207 in the VIN, we still cannot know with utmost certainty that this car was the 207th built. Even with limited-production vehicles, they were often produced in batches and then tagged/numbered/stamped with their VINs. All we know for certain is that your car is one of the first-year examples and it was tagged with the number 207. We try to avoid making specific claims about production sequence mainly because it can lead to tangential discussions and debates in the comments when an auction goes live. This approach and format have been developed and proven over the course of 110k+ auctions and our community understands and appreciates it. If you look back at the car's listing when you won the auction, you will note that we did not include the #207 inline or in the title, showing the consistency of our format.
to which I wrote:
"I strongly disagree that it would be detrimental to call the car Viper #207, but will yield to your decision. I show the car often, and that is what the Viper people refer to their 1992s as, regardless of your comment about the batches
and they came back with:
"Hi Yancy, Thank you for your message. I know you are frustrated, and I can see where our position can be perceived as obstinate. Historically, we haven't mentioned production numbers in Viper listings because of the difficulty in proving sequential production numbers. But, before we leave the topic completely, do you have any documentation (other than the VIN) that could prove the production sequence and that your car is actually the 207th built? If so, please send our way, and we will review."
Can anyone help me document this, or at least tell me that their position is reasonable?
Thanks in advance
" Thank you for sending over your change requests, and I hope the following will adequately address them. Our formatting will not accommodate your request to add “#207” to the headline, as we need to keep those as concise as possible, and the number 207 doesn’t really distinguish the car from the other 1992 Vipers. As for the number 207 in the VIN, we still cannot know with utmost certainty that this car was the 207th built. Even with limited-production vehicles, they were often produced in batches and then tagged/numbered/stamped with their VINs. All we know for certain is that your car is one of the first-year examples and it was tagged with the number 207. We try to avoid making specific claims about production sequence mainly because it can lead to tangential discussions and debates in the comments when an auction goes live. This approach and format have been developed and proven over the course of 110k+ auctions and our community understands and appreciates it. If you look back at the car's listing when you won the auction, you will note that we did not include the #207 inline or in the title, showing the consistency of our format.
to which I wrote:
"I strongly disagree that it would be detrimental to call the car Viper #207, but will yield to your decision. I show the car often, and that is what the Viper people refer to their 1992s as, regardless of your comment about the batches
and they came back with:
"Hi Yancy, Thank you for your message. I know you are frustrated, and I can see where our position can be perceived as obstinate. Historically, we haven't mentioned production numbers in Viper listings because of the difficulty in proving sequential production numbers. But, before we leave the topic completely, do you have any documentation (other than the VIN) that could prove the production sequence and that your car is actually the 207th built? If so, please send our way, and we will review."
Can anyone help me document this, or at least tell me that their position is reasonable?
Thanks in advance