Hello everyone.
I have a sad story. My C7 has started to fall apart after just one day. I'm trying to be low drama and light humor here, but I'm quite upset on the inside. I was trying to break her in gentle and she still broke.
So.. Know that there were already fitment and paint issues that the dealer agreed to take care of in writing. so add to that the after delivery issues:
1. The A/c stopped working. #after 1 day!
2. The break pedal came loose! #after 1 day!
3.The rear end has started tracking funny. Think hydroplaning, but in dry low-speed corners #after 1 day
4. so I limp back to the dealership, and the first thing they tell me is they found a different window sticker for that car (VIN) with a different price on it (***?)
5. Which might explain some of the other confusion like the upgraded wheels on the window sticker I have really are not the wheels on the car after all. (*** x2) (not that you can tell the difference on GM's website to really know since the dang pictures are so tiny.)
So, to those that have great cars, congrats. To those taking delivery soon, check off and test every button, dial, switch and line item on the window sticker. Look for paint bubbles and/or runs on the corners and identify panel gaps that don't line up correctly.
My opinion is the C7 needs to go back to quality control for a few more months.
Sure a few first run minor tweaks might pop-up, we all know that.. but this was too much. I asked for my money back. (did I mention the freakin' break pedal CAME LOOSE!!!)
GM will be onsite first thing Monday to evaluate. Will they refund me and take the car off to a lab someplace to dissect it?
134 more Corvettes than Vipers are built every day? I'm ok with those numbers. lol
The new gen problems are very unusual and as you say previous models have been mostly bulletproof. The quality and reliability especially for recent models have been great, until now from what I see.Are new gen Corvettes always like that? Serious question, really....I've never pre-ordered one....always waited for the Z06 and by that time they've been pretty bulletproof. Wonder if this is normal release issues or not (a bad thing either way but if not normal, than stay away from the C7's for a few months ;-)
There have been a few QA issues with the Viper too, I think you'll just see a lot more since the C7 is mass produced. All that matters is how Chevy handles it really. SRT has been great on my minor QA issues...
Not sure where you are getting your data, but Gen V has had a decent amount of minor and major quality issues. I can tell you that I know of a few buy backs, full engine repairs/swaps, fit/finish repairs, etc. Considering less than 500 were sold, the percentage of initial quality problems have to be >5% (based only on what I have personally heard of). That is HUGE.
Not sure where you are getting your data, but Gen V has had a decent amount of minor and major quality issues. I can tell you that I know of a few buy backs, full engine repairs/swaps, fit/finish repairs, etc. Considering less than 500 were sold, the percentage of initial quality problems have to be >5% (based only on what I have personally heard of). That is HUGE.
SRT/Gilles lost focus on what the Viper is. They blew it and they know it. Will they fix it?
Before questioning the owner of a Gen V on his sources of data, how about you spill it on where you seem to get your information on those problem cars?
Over 6,000 miles on mine, no issues to report. No dealership visits. I won't freak out if anything does occur, being a first year model.
SRT/Gilles lost focus on what the Viper is. They blew it and they know it. Will they fix it?
3000 on mine and everything is perfect. When someone throws out a phantom number (5%), why do the following posters use that number like it was documented by god.
Calculating from this site, we only have had 1 lemon Gen V posted. So, 1/436 sold = 0.2% of actual Gen V owners are unhappy with their purchase.
Horrible!
But, about 99.8% of non-owners seem to enjoy bashing on the Gen V, and making up statistics about them.
Ill give the preceding poster that his point is valid. Preceding poster, time will tell what the real number is. But you have to admit that with so few Vipers out there and hearing quite a few stories, both minor and major, you just have to be concerned as a Viper lover. That is the direction my post was coming from, however eroneous the number is. You can argue over that number and detract from the serious factual issues being pointed to but those issues will still remain.
If say, 450 Vipers were sold, all you would need is 4.5 of them troubled to be 1%, 9 to be 2% and 22.5 to be 5% etc I'm sure you know the numbers. So where will the real number fall? We will see. But no question there are some serious QC and factory/dealer support problems. What happened to KB should never have happened, especially as high profile as his case is. Its all around the internet. It seems SRT doesnt care about its reputation on the world stage much less care about a customer. Thats the feeling it gives off.
BTW if im bashing anything its SRT's mismannagement not the G5 per se.
I highly doubt that all the owners of the 436 Viprs sold post on this site. Is there even 100 owners on this site? 50? 40 etc? So that 1 in 436 hardly means anything really. We really dont know what the real number is. Even if its significant or not.
While some people might worry about bogus percentages, others of us are out enjoying the new Vipers. Until other people start paying for my cars, I'll decide what to buy and drive, on my own. Many of these internet arguments about car vs car are silly. Some of us just buy both cars in question.
I highly doubt that all the owners of the 436 Viprs sold post on this site. Is there even 100 owners on this site? 50? 40 etc? So that 1 in 436 hardly means anything really. We really dont know what the real number is. Even if its significant or not.
I think the issue is two fold. I think everyone expects there maybe minor hiccups along the way. I have documented the issues I have had, albeit minor. My local dealer has been nothing short of fantastic.
The bigger issue is, as you said, SRT mismanaging the situation. IMHO kris issue was a minor thing that should have been resolved in no time. SRT should have shipped the car back to HQ and done the repairs after a week of it sitting at the local dealership. It would have shown resolve and standing behind their product. There really is no reason Kris's issue got to being a buy back - if SRT handled it all well, they would have had a great story on hands.
The Internet is a powerful tool. I'd have been a bit more harsh in my dealing with things than Kris did, I tip my hat to him for being so level headed. But as you said, Kris's story is all over the internet now.
Don't know how many on this site SB, meaning all boards, but I'd guess only 20 or so post on this forum, and most of them occcasionally. I'm sure there are many present and former VCA members with 5's, who aren't even posting here...can't say I blame them.