I need to get a life, you guys had me weld some scrap steel with a flux core MIG welder.. as you can see with a flux core wire there is splatter, but the weld is good.. if it's worse than this I would be disappointed because I'm just a hobbyist..
You must be registered for see images
Gas fed MIG would be cleaner, and TIG would be beautiful, especially by a pro or robot. Hand MIG welding is the last expensive method for low volume, the Viper frame was done in Windsor by a company called Fabco, they mention it on their website also.
http://www.tkafabco.com/products.htm
Welds are going to be better on a high volume car, higher tolerances, better fixtures / jigs and mostly robotic / controlled welding, tooling, etc.. Unfortunately people tend to think they get a premium manufactured car because of the cost, but it's not always the case. The cost of manufacturing and tooling is justified the volume ROI. There's minimal tooling and more hand fabricating on the Viper, no sense building a $500,000 die for a couple thousand frame rails or hydroforming crossmembers, etc. since the efficiency in reduced time to manufacture and volume is low, such as 1500 cars per year compared to the Windsor Chrysler minivan plant which produces 330,000 minivans per year, the low volume car would be extremely expensive to make a profit in the end with the same tooling and manufacturing processes. As I was told before in the Viper group, you could build the frame in your garage if you can weld, cut and bend steel, because practically nothing was punched by a press..
Fabco also had the first Canadian Viper, there's a picture of it that I posted in the Ontario forum, the first Canadian Viper.. In the end, the Viper is an impressive feat by those who designed and built with a limited budget compared to higher volume cars. Corvettes have a much higher budget, much more engineering resources, more tooling, more carryover parts, etc.. because of the high volume at around 20,000 per year, in 1984 it was the highest at 51,547 per year.. People tend to compare the 2 cars, and I am more impressed with the Viper because of the limited resources in comparison to build it. I've been involved with tooling for Corvettes in the past, the life expectancy of a tool (mold / die) required is usually 7 - 9 years. Nothing against Corvettes, we own a C5, and it's a good car, but it's not a Viper.
It's a trade off.. if it was manufactured and designed similar to a high volume car (all the good stuff, corrosion protection, all the tooling, etc..), it would probably cost more than $500k at such a low volume, or 100,000 volume per year car that is more common (hypothetically if there were that many buyers..) guessing it would cost $40k, or a what we have today as a low volume, moderately expensive and relatively rare. It's kind of what happened to the Hummer, the H1 is similar to the Viper in that respect being a hand built rare brute of a vehicle in the same price range, but GM found the niche for a high volume H2 / H3 and now they are more common.
This is the longest reply I have ever made, all because of a weld..