HardHitter
Enthusiast
- Joined
- May 15, 2011
- Posts
- 57
- Reaction score
- 0
I posted something similar on the other Viper forum but always good to get multiple opinions
I am looking at getting myself into a Viper. Now although most of you seem to have more bias towards the GTS model, I for one actually like the low and wide stance of the RT/10s. The other thing that I love about the RT/10 is the side exhaust which is why I've been looking at Gen Is.
Now wherever I go, it seems as though everyone is always saying spend the money on a Gen II because it is built 110% better than the Gen I.
My questions is really towards are they truly that big of a difference even when the Gen I has modifications to address the shortfalls of a Gen I?
From what I know of (again, not an expert) the primary differences between the Gen I and Gen II are as follows:
- GTS version was introduced
- Motor work to increase the power and cut weight (from dyno charts, there isn't that large of a power gain I believe)
- Redesigned chassis to increase handling and cut weight
- Redesigned suspension to increase handling and reduce braking distances
- Introduced airbags (96 GTS, 97 RT/10)
- Introduction of powered windows
- ABS in 2001
- Side exit exhaust stopped in 1996
Now to address my arguments:
If I were to find a Gen I with modifications to suspension (coilovers) and aftermarket brakes (brembo kit) then would that basically bring the Gen I up to par of a Gen II or what were your thoughts?
Here is the car I'm looking at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a14w37eCMyU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjMLrRSDfCc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqf3mfMax4U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1dDgCpSZLw
I am looking at getting myself into a Viper. Now although most of you seem to have more bias towards the GTS model, I for one actually like the low and wide stance of the RT/10s. The other thing that I love about the RT/10 is the side exhaust which is why I've been looking at Gen Is.
Now wherever I go, it seems as though everyone is always saying spend the money on a Gen II because it is built 110% better than the Gen I.
My questions is really towards are they truly that big of a difference even when the Gen I has modifications to address the shortfalls of a Gen I?
From what I know of (again, not an expert) the primary differences between the Gen I and Gen II are as follows:
- GTS version was introduced
- Motor work to increase the power and cut weight (from dyno charts, there isn't that large of a power gain I believe)
- Redesigned chassis to increase handling and cut weight
- Redesigned suspension to increase handling and reduce braking distances
- Introduced airbags (96 GTS, 97 RT/10)
- Introduction of powered windows
- ABS in 2001
- Side exit exhaust stopped in 1996
Now to address my arguments:
If I were to find a Gen I with modifications to suspension (coilovers) and aftermarket brakes (brembo kit) then would that basically bring the Gen I up to par of a Gen II or what were your thoughts?
Here is the car I'm looking at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a14w37eCMyU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjMLrRSDfCc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqf3mfMax4U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1dDgCpSZLw