natsfan
Viper Owner
Looking to get my first Viper and am debating between getting a Gen II GTS or a Gen III/IV coupe. If I get get a Gen II will go for a 2002 with 15k or less miles. If I get a Gen III/IV I would probably get a 2006 maybe a 2008 with 30k or less miles.
How do the cars compare? Will one be more reliable? Is one better for a first time owner? I plan to drive the car a lot, own it for a long time, and learn to drive it well. Maybe even some autocross.
Here are the pros and cons I see of each car. However, I have not driven either so I don't know what I am talking about.
2002 pro:
Great looking design with a lot of history
Cheaper to buy
May become a collector car
2002 cons:
Brakes are not up to the performance level of the rest of the car
Older (will the car be less reliable and harder to fix?)
2006/2008 pro:
More power. (However, 450 is more than enough for me right now)
Better brakes
Better interior (In my opinion)
2006/2008:
Does not look as good (in my opinion)
More expensive.
Thanks for the help and feed back.
How do the cars compare? Will one be more reliable? Is one better for a first time owner? I plan to drive the car a lot, own it for a long time, and learn to drive it well. Maybe even some autocross.
Here are the pros and cons I see of each car. However, I have not driven either so I don't know what I am talking about.
2002 pro:
Great looking design with a lot of history
Cheaper to buy
May become a collector car
2002 cons:
Brakes are not up to the performance level of the rest of the car
Older (will the car be less reliable and harder to fix?)
2006/2008 pro:
More power. (However, 450 is more than enough for me right now)
Better brakes
Better interior (In my opinion)
2006/2008:
Does not look as good (in my opinion)
More expensive.
Thanks for the help and feed back.