Hi Allan. One of the upgrades I did to my former supercharged Gen III was the installation of a Gen IV ACR front antisway bar. The rear one was the same as stock. The difference was immediately noticeable. It was an inexpensive and worthwhile mod.
Thanks Bob!
One concern I have is to maintain the car's current understeer/oversteer handling characteristic, with a tendency towards neutral if anything. With Hoosiers and track alignment, the car will slightly understeer in a high speed corner with maintenance throttle on. I'm OK with this, I'd just like to carry more mid corner speed and it seems that reducing the amount of body roll would help. -Not going to resort to adding aero bits to the car, I'd buy an ACR before I try to convert my gen III into a poser version of one.
From my understanding of research I've done, the rear bar being stiffer will help reduce understeer. Stiffening the front bar only will make the car oversteer. I'm wondering if the Snakeoyl setup is a balanced improvement front/rear or is biased one way or the other or adjustable.
The ACR bars should both be stiffer than the gen III OEM, unless they engineered them to work with the aero stuff, hence the same bar in the rear. The wing on the back keeps the car planted.
How did changing the front bar only affect the car's handling at the limit? Did the car become tail happy?