balance
Enthusiast
What is comparable for the $$? Sit in a new Porsche, Maserati etc... because that is the quality of the GenV cabin. Then factor in the performance ... this car is amazing!
I'm more than a bit puzzled by the comments that the car is a let down because the design does not go far enough. The design of the 2-gen GTS is iconic and, IMO, once you get it right (AC Cobra, Porsche 911, to name a couple), you don't make drastic changes. After getting it right most changes are incremental, as they should be. The outgoing car strayed from this a bit with mixed results. This car corrects those mistakes, IMO, and puts the car back on the correct styling/design path. I can see guys quibbling about the details, like the Porsche guys quibble about the head lamps on the 996 versus the 993s and 997s, but very few quibble about the basic 911 design principles and for good reason. I believe the design of the 2013 Viper places the styling of this car right where it needs to be. It absolutely cannot be mistaken for anything else, it's a Viper through and through and those are very good things, IMO.
Ken.
If SRT is listening, at least half, if not the majority agree the car looks fantastic, but the only letdown was the HP numbers. Mostly because of the Mopar engines launched a few months back that mislead us into thinking there was an 8.7 liter in the works. To redeem themselve in this one area, the ACR better not be just an aero package, but a bump in HP. Who knows, I have a feeling the HP numbers may be underated. Hasn't everyone noticed it say "ESTIMATED" HP everywhere, even in the spec sheet? I think SRT left some room in there for competitive error. Remember when the GEN3 came out with 500HP then was bumped to 510 when the Z06 claimed 505? This engine may be underated. They can't beat the F12, at least on paper. But I have a feeling it will, then they'll say "oops" and "nothing we can do now". The 1/4 mile times and RW dyno results will tell. Anything under 10.7 will have to be more than 640 HP. based on the HP to weight. I also have a feeling Mopar will release a chip that will up this thing to 675 or better.
At any rate, Forged Pistons are welcome back with open arms. This means forced induction and nitrous are a viable solution again for those that need it. And to all the naysayers, you can NEVER have too much HP on a good platform. There will always be room for more. My GEN1 is a lot funner at 550HP than 400HP. And I think the GEN5 will be a better slate to start from for power adders than the 2000 - 2010's. Maybe Roe can make a bolt-on supercharger for the current Viper again.
Robert,
You are too kind to the complainers. I am very disappointed in the threads/posts I have seen in this section. It's one thing to offer an opinion, but some of the posts and thread titles are rude at best.
Funny thing is why are these guys hung up on this 700 HP crap?
I guess 640 HP isn't good enough for these guys.... they wouldn't know what to do with a Gen1 with 400 HP let alone 640 HP on the Gen V.
The most action they get out of their Vipers is driving it on and off the trailer. And lets not forget the real thrill of polishing their Viper for hours with a baby diaper.
Maybe they need more horsepower bragging rights to compensate for a deficiency in something else.
Now that I have now struck a nerve with some of these people..... they can sit back and see how the SRT engineers might feel about some of this garbage they have been reading on this discussion forum.
By the way SRT, the car is gorgeous!
Has the Viper ever had a horsepower bump within the same generation?
I would think that would be death to resale values of the "slower" year.