Intake Gen 2 vs Gen 3

Dan Cragin

Legacy/Supporting Vendor
Supporting Vendor
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Posts
1,308
Reaction score
80
Location
LA, CA
No, not on a stock engine. To be honest, some gains can be found going the opposite direction.
 

luc

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 19, 2000
Posts
1,038
Reaction score
6
Location
Paso Robles CA
Funny, when the SRT10 ( Gen 3) came out in 2003, Dodge was claiming that the single TB intake manifold was "better" and an "improvement" over the double TB of the Gen 2. Same with the hood. Better and improvement to their bottom line may be, to the car, no way. Pure marketing BS
 

Dan Cragin

Legacy/Supporting Vendor
Supporting Vendor
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Posts
1,308
Reaction score
80
Location
LA, CA
The later short runner intake was a compromise, it lacks volume and was designed to fit under the hood. With the single throttle body design and short runners it is better for driveability and peak power, but the long runner Gen 1-2 manifold makes much more torque across the powerband.

When we were selling Vipers at the dealer years back, we would sell them on Friday and they would be in the bodyshop on Monday. People were not used to the torque. As the Viper evolved, the power delivery was softened up and moved higher in the rpm band. Thats why the Gen 4-5's feel a bit fluffy down low. The new drive by wire cars limit throttle angle in the lower gears (torque management).
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
153,645
Posts
1,685,213
Members
18,221
Latest member
tractor1996
Top