I'm throwing the penalty flag now. Ever stock ZR1 to date has dyno'd 530-540 rwhp and now this one has a 30+ HP jump? Good job Edmunds. Now we know GM sends a little different vehicle for mag tests. I'm calling their new Laguna record BS now.
Good luck with that one. The LS9 (and LS7) follow a specific set of SAE standards for torque testing, and every one of them out of the Wixom plant are within a few HP of the rated number. There was nothing special about the car Edmund's got for testing; it was no different than one you or I could buy off a dealer's lot.
Like it or not, that little mouse is still a very potent power plant.
jas
Never said it wasn't a good power plant. What I'm saying is this car had a dyno result of over 30 HP better than what a stock ZR1 usually does and with 91 octane. Sorry, calling BS.
So the Zr1 has more power and tq but the viper is faster in the 1/4 mile?
That is one of the highest "stock" ZR1 dynos I have seen.
I am curious what the comparison would have looked like after 3, 4 or 5 pulls.
And the Viper 558/528 would have to be expected considering Gen IV typically dyno in the 530-540 range.
Did I miss where it mentioned what the numbers were in the article for the ZR1? Or did they just like to post a pretty graph?
Wow, hope the 91 Octane is to blame for those numbers. My 08 Viper made 560whp bone stock with about 600 miles on it.
So the Gen 5 is going to be inexorably linked to the ZR1 forever it appears.
The majority of the the Gen IV's were 520-530 rwhp on an accurate dyno that used the SAE correction factors and normal smoothing.
I'm throwing the penalty flag now. Ever stock ZR1 to date has dyno'd 530-540 rwhp and now this one has a 30+ HP jump? Good job Edmunds. Now we know GM sends a little different vehicle for mag tests. I'm calling their new Laguna record BS now.