Work done at major oil company chemical additive division showed that oil related deposits are for practical purposes not removeable by aftermarket treatments, engine flushes, special quarts, etc. Chemicals that were agressive enough to remove them also removed seals and gaskets... Many products are various forms of solvents and their low viscosity allows fluid to flow through restricted orifices, but does not clean any parts. Once the deposits are there, the only way to remove them is physically. Hence the need for adequate oil change intervals.
In regards to Accusumps, priming, or general pre-oiling, the fact is that these days, cars are driven to the junk yard and not towed. There are sufficient additives and start-up oil flow requirements that cranking, starting, and initial running does not "wear out" an engine. Please do not underestimate the performance of the lubricant additive systems; while you see the oil drain back into the pan, the anti-wear, anti-friction, and anti-corrosion additives are chemically "magnetic" (i.e. polar) in nature and stick to the metal surfaces to protect the hardware for the next startup. FinalGTS disagreed with me over the Accusump kit thinking I didn't think it was worthwhile; my opinion is that the Accusump will: provide oil for a few seconds under high-g turns, provide oil before cranking, quiet lifters upon startup, but will not: measureably extend the life of your engine or extend the life of your lifters (assuming appropriate oil change intervals.)
There may be some benefit over extended storage periods if the additives decompose; this would be an in-use version of the lubricant's "shelf life." If the storage period is truly extended, then a low viscosity oil (SAE 0W-xx) should be used to have the best startup flow characteristics.
Let's recall that cylinder walls, cam lobes, timing chains, rocker arms are all splash lubricated and pre-oiling doesn't eliminate "dry" starts anyway.