https://autos.yahoo.com/news/2015-chevrolet-corvette-z06-much-heavier-predecessor-125014722.html
Seems the new Z06 weighs 3524lbs.
Seems the new Z06 weighs 3524lbs.
GTR: 3,825lbs and 0-60 in under 3 seconds. That's as fast as a 1,350lb. V-8 Ariel Atom. Would somebody care to explain the physics?
and I can see a few Vette guys coming over to Viper for the more analogue, exotic and exclusive aspects,
/\ SLS has a n/a v8. The 7 speed DCT is whats doing all the magic.
Remember the viper vs amg sls comparison? SLS down ~20hp, ~130tq, weighs ~400lbs more. Beat the viper in the 1/4 mile and nearly a 1.5 second gap at Laguna Seca. Im VERY interested to see some real world test.
Yea, what they said. Weight to HP isn't a solid ratio to judge actual measured perf anymore. GT-R is the poster child for this in breaking the laws of physics, lol.
Also, to give credit where it's due, Vette has always achieved impressive perf #s without eye popping HP #s, the out going Z06 to me virtually defies physics, it makes so much use of its "low" HP amount and achieves such impressive straight & road course times, I have no thoughts that an extra 100 lbs or so I going to be a challenge for them to compensate.
GTR: 3,825lbs and 0-60 in under 3 seconds. That's as fast as a 1,350lb. V-8 Ariel Atom. Would somebody care to explain the physics?
https://autos.yahoo.com/news/2015-chevrolet-corvette-z06-much-heavier-predecessor-125014722.html
Seems the new Z06 weighs 3524lbs.
It was the same day same driver (Randy Pobst) in the Motor Trend test. No doubt the Viper could have went faster(as proof already exist with a faster lap with Pobst driving). But im sure the SLS could pick up some time too with more track time. Either way, it was just to show that a car with less hp/tq and more weight can hang with and beat a car with an "on paper" advantage.The lap time records still show the Gen 5 (and even the Gen 4 ACR) on top though, so what were the circumstances behind this? Same driver in both cars? The Viper definitely takes a skilled hand to get it around a track quickly, so I could understand the large difference with someone less experienced behind the wheel. Just trying to understand the conflicting information out there.
Agreed.I can't. I fully expect the C7 Z06 to beat the Gen V time at Laguna Seca, mainly because it HAS to.
As in it would be considered a failure if it does not and GM certainly knows that.
Not JUST straight-line performance.No doubt the DCT is magic for straight-line performance.
/\ SLS has a n/a v8. The 7 speed DCT is whats doing all the magic.
I never understand the vette-viper discussion, I like both cars for what they are and if I wanted the best handling car...I would not have bought either of them. But I guess the competition is good for everybody, it makes both cars better and better!
The Viper clearly doesn't have the best suspension, and clearly doesn't have the best brakes. But it has plenty of torque. I think it was Enzo Ferrari who said "horsepower sells cars, but torque wins races".Wondering what you'd buy to get better handling. Considering the fastest 5 laptimes at Laguna are all vipers and Vettes, and then 6th is Mclaren, before going back to a viper again in 7th, are there better handling cars that are yet slower around a road course?
True.This should make us appreciate the effort SRT went through to add all the luxury bits but still drop nearly 75 pounds.
Never heard that, but I love it...classic.I think it was Enzo Ferrari who said "horsepower sells cars, but torque wins races".
NOT GOOD for Viperdom.Prices were just released for the C7 Z06. Starting at $78,995.
Non-racers focus too much on peak hp numbers. Experienced racers understand that the highest average hp under the curve for the racing RPM powerband, is what what really matters. The 911 Turbo S, the SLS, and the Z06 all have one thing in common - forced induction. That means they have a lot more torque and hp under the entire hp curve, not just a high peak value. Naturally aspirated engines tend to have more peaky hp curves, and require higher rpm to perform their best. FI cars can usually do very well, at any rpm they start with.
The base car's pricing looks good to attract the mass market, Corvette's target audience. When well-optioned for serious performance and to compete with higher-end cars it's double the cost of a C7, yet shares the same paint quality. Those wanting an exotic supercar can choose the Gen V with confidence, and real savings. Those who don't have a more expensive Corvette to consider. I'll be curious to see if it'll stands up better on the track than the current C7.
The Viper clearly doesn't have the best suspension, and clearly doesn't have the best brakes. But it has plenty of torque. I think it was Enzo Ferrari who said "horsepower sells cars, but torque wins races".
Non-racers focus too much on peak hp numbers. Experienced racers understand that the highest average hp under the curve for the racing RPM powerband, is what what really matters. The 911 Turbo S, the SLS, and the Z06 all have one thing in common - forced induction. That means they have a lot more torque and hp under the entire hp curve, not just a high peak value. Naturally aspirated engines tend to have more peaky hp curves, and require higher rpm to perform their best. FI cars can usually do very well, at any rpm they start with.
Yea, what they said. Weight to HP isn't a solid ratio to judge actual measured perf anymore. GT-R is the poster child for this in breaking the laws of physics, lol.
Also, to give credit where it's due, Vette has always achieved impressive perf #s without eye popping HP #s, the out going Z06 to me virtually defies physics, it makes so much use of its "low" HP amount and achieves such impressive straight & road course times, I have no thoughts that an extra 100 lbs or so I going to be a challenge for them to compensate.
No further proof need than the 'Ring times between the ZR1 and the Z06. Three seconds over a 7 minute track.
ZR1: 7.19.63
Z06: 7:22:68
It was the same day same driver (Randy Pobst) in the Motor Trend test. No doubt the Viper could have went faster(as proof already exist with a faster lap with Pobst driving). But im sure the SLS could pick up some time too with more track time. Either way, it was just to show that a car with less hp/tq and more weight can hang with and beat a car with an "on paper" advantage.
Im sure GM will send the Z06 out to testers wearing the MPSC again too. Such an advantage right out of the gate....
This should make us appreciate the effort SRT went through to add all the luxury bits but still drop nearly 75 pounds.
The Viper clearly doesn't have the best suspension, and clearly doesn't have the best brakes. But it has plenty of torque. I think it was Enzo Ferrari who said "horsepower sells cars, but torque wins races".
You would be surprised to see what the high-end Porsche/McLaren/Ferrari crowd are saying about the old ZR1 and now the new Z06. Quite a few P1, 12c, Ferrari owners are raving about it and are planning to purchase it as daily drivers. Chevy will sell these Z06's to the usual target audience of course but also to the same crowd SRT/Dodge/Fiat was after. I'm pretty sure some Viper owners will also purchase one as quite a few did in in the past. The Z06 may not be exotic and rare as the Viper but will be moddable, probably just as fast/faster than the G5, have some of the bells and whistles that crowd want and has a cheaper base MSRP. Its going to be a hard package to compete with even if its not as reliable as the Snake.
Yea I know that's a cute saying, but then a 700 lb/ft of tq turbo diesel truck would win races against Ferrari's. When defending lower HP cars, this is nice marketing, although they tend to have low tq as well, lol. I'd argue it's easily an equal formula, making tons of tq I one thing, making it quicker is HP, and acceleration is dependent on both.
I just find it interesting when we talk about the viper suspension not being the best, the motor being antiquated tech, not enough power, intrusive nannies, and whatever else, and it holds the track records ... on arguably inferior tires to the MPSCs no less. That's all.
Agreed.Full of wrong.
But the truth is a loaded Z06 is a little more than 90K for a Z06 with 2LZ and the Z07 performance package.
They won't be able to keep them on the lot.
Not surprising...on paper, the car is formidable.You would be surprised to see what the high-end Porsche/McLaren/Ferrari crowd are saying about the old ZR1 and now the new Z06.