proracer1's Roe s/c dyno chart

J DAWG

Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 9, 2002
Posts
2,238
Reaction score
0
Location
MS
proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

195CHART.JPG

:usa:
 
OP
OP
J

J DAWG

Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 9, 2002
Posts
2,238
Reaction score
0
Location
MS
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

List of mods - "What do you get when you slap a pair of Jeff Morys cylinder heads,a Sean Roe supercharger with the 8 LB pulley,T&D rockers,JE pistons,Oneill Rods, 50 LB injectors,two bosch fuel pumps,Arrow racing machine work, Larry Macedo's tuning help,and it's all assembled by John Edwards?????? 734 foot pounds of torque and 729.5 HP. These are corrected numbers. OH ya...93 octane."
 

MbnViper

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Posts
489
Reaction score
0
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

wooooooooooow :eek: what this blue line doing up there :D i love torque, nice ride man
 

V10 MOJO

Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 17, 2002
Posts
1,718
Reaction score
0
Location
Youngstown, Ohio
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

now THATS what i like to see; torque across the board. HP is great but if you dont have torque to show it off it aint squat. beautiful
 

BlueGTS

Viper Owner
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Posts
845
Reaction score
0
Location
Morris County, NJ
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

Why are you showing an Excel rendering of a dyno chart? The HP and TQ does not cross at 5252? Do you have the actual dyno chart?
 

Jerome Sparich

Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 16, 2001
Posts
1,183
Reaction score
0
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

The hp and tq will cross at 5252rpm on an engine dyno not wheel dyno.
 

proracer1

Enthusiast
Joined
May 16, 2003
Posts
369
Reaction score
0
Location
Michigan
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

Thanks to every one for the PROPS.....I will post pics of this "PROM QUEEN" at a later date...As John Edwards stated..."LOOKS LIKE THE PROM QUEEN PUTS OUT"
 

proracer1

Enthusiast
Joined
May 16, 2003
Posts
369
Reaction score
0
Location
Michigan
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

Larry Macedo is going to dial in the car at the end of the month. We should see better numbers. I'll keep all informed.
 

jcaspar1

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 3, 2000
Posts
1,126
Reaction score
0
Location
Sacramento, CA
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

HP and Torque are always equal at 5252 rpm by defination. Impossibe for them not to be no matter the type of dyno or type of car....

HP=(TqxRPM)/5252 If RPM=5252, HP=Tq

Click here for more information.

This may not hold true for the metric system but who uses that anyways. :cool:
 
S

SUN RA KAT

Guest
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

Now, THAT'S IMPRESSIVE!

I don't come close to those numbers with my calculated flywheel numbers...
 

PhilC

Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 14, 2001
Posts
511
Reaction score
0
Location
Jackson, NJ, USA
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

I agree that by definition the two curves must cross at 5252, but can anyone explain what might be the cause of so many dyno curves failing to empirically display that fact.
 

RSNAKE

Viper Owner
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
123
Reaction score
0
Location
Pittsburgh, PA USA
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

If the HP and Torque are plotted on different axis (for instance if the left axis is HP and the right axis is Torque) and the axis are on different scales (one is 300 to 500 and the other is 300 to 600) then they won't intersect at 5252. If the axis are the same they always will.
 

MaxedGTS

Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 5, 2001
Posts
795
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

Thats very nice power but am i missing something? is that rear wheel hp?
Either way thats good power.

Max
 

joe117

Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Posts
5,391
Reaction score
1
Location
Maryland, USA
Re: proracer1\'s Roe s/c dyno chart

The hp and torque numbers will be the same at 5252, in other words, if there is 500hp shown at 5252, then there will be 500 ft/lb of torque at 5252.

From 3200 to 5200 the torque stays within a 25 ft/lb range.
That is a very flat curve. Is that because of something the sc is doing? Some kind of limiting? It seems very flat.

I just did a little math on the numbers in the graph and it looks like the problem is that the x axis of the chart, the rpm numbers, are not in the proper places. The crossing point is probably 5252rpm. The rpm numbers are placed improperly.
 
Top