brett
Enthusiast
What is going on? I've seen a lot more posts getting locked without vulgarity or anything that would be considered harmful to anybody involved, including posts in the "Off Topic" section. ie.(I'm Back) Yet when I look in this section I see a "******* match" between Sean Roe and Tom Welch about their products. I also see new products listed in this section including prices all the time...shouldn't that be under New Products and Supplier Specials? I'm just looking for a some consistency.
Another interesting point that has been made is that the "Kid banning" brought more people to a thread than any post I've seen in a long time, even under the old format. The interesting, controversional and sometime humorous subjects bring people to the board and they get involved. The post about a Yellow Viper on I-10 will get two or three responses if that. I'm not looking to turn this board into a "slam fest", but I would like to know how these decisions are made. I know when we pile on Adelberg, half the west coast jumps on board and even some of the heartland boys get involved and it will go until he's a bloody stump. Somebody else traipses into the lions den and he gets the standing eight in the first round and the thread is locked. Why? I'm all for informative posts and have helped whenever it was needed, but someone adds levity and it gets attention and shortly after it gets "locked".
Whenever I look at a thread I can tell by a glance once I'm in it whether or not I want to respond or (more importantly) read it. I don't understand why the rest of the people involved aren't able to do the same, and why the moderators of the board feel as though they need to make these decisions for the readers. I would think we need to keep subjects in their proper forums and not allow any profantiy to appear on this board long before we incorporate censorship for the timid, shy , offended, three legged, etc... I think it "seems" like there are only few that are concerned about this, that's misleading. The few that are voicing an opion are the "usual suspects" that are willing to stand up to keep things alive and well on this board. Granted, they sometimes have some "off color" comments and like to point out the obvious, but in the past it wasn't grounds for banishment. I also think it stepped up only after it was made "illegal". Legalize these threads! They do have a place on this board and it can be as it once was.
Another interesting point that has been made is that the "Kid banning" brought more people to a thread than any post I've seen in a long time, even under the old format. The interesting, controversional and sometime humorous subjects bring people to the board and they get involved. The post about a Yellow Viper on I-10 will get two or three responses if that. I'm not looking to turn this board into a "slam fest", but I would like to know how these decisions are made. I know when we pile on Adelberg, half the west coast jumps on board and even some of the heartland boys get involved and it will go until he's a bloody stump. Somebody else traipses into the lions den and he gets the standing eight in the first round and the thread is locked. Why? I'm all for informative posts and have helped whenever it was needed, but someone adds levity and it gets attention and shortly after it gets "locked".
Whenever I look at a thread I can tell by a glance once I'm in it whether or not I want to respond or (more importantly) read it. I don't understand why the rest of the people involved aren't able to do the same, and why the moderators of the board feel as though they need to make these decisions for the readers. I would think we need to keep subjects in their proper forums and not allow any profantiy to appear on this board long before we incorporate censorship for the timid, shy , offended, three legged, etc... I think it "seems" like there are only few that are concerned about this, that's misleading. The few that are voicing an opion are the "usual suspects" that are willing to stand up to keep things alive and well on this board. Granted, they sometimes have some "off color" comments and like to point out the obvious, but in the past it wasn't grounds for banishment. I also think it stepped up only after it was made "illegal". Legalize these threads! They do have a place on this board and it can be as it once was.