I think my 2000 is the most amazing piece of fun to drive! The non-ABS is part of that.
Coming from a C6 Z06 I made the transition exactly because of all the Nannies to a car that demands all of my attention and so much more skill and care. Not flat-spotting the tires and finding the greatest decelleration technique is part of the package. The 2000 Rocks!
BTW I was watching Speed channel the other day and they were mentioning the race cars transitioning from ABS to non-ABS as it makes for faster lap times.
A hightech super expensive (worth more than our entire car) system could stop faster than non ABS - probably. Our ABS surges the brakes and I doubt that the ABS could come close to a good driver that just brakes at the threshold (7-11% tire slippage) since it prevents the tire from skidding. Our ABS purpose is to use less brakes and allow control for turning around corners - not designed for max deceleration. Most of us are probably better than ABS under good conditions. In bad conditions some of us (the "I want nannies crowd") would panic and skid off the road. ABS and non-ABS both have advantages and disadvantages. An excellent driver will outperform any normal priced nannies easily and that's why the ACR should have a OFF switch on it's ABS system. Since it's the fastest road car in the world, perhaps it's just perfect the way it is and ABS doesn't slow it down any more than Ferrari or Porsche's ABS systems do?
I like my ABS as it does the brake pressure proportioning for me and I don't have to attempt to spend days trying to perfect my front - rear brake balance after installing lightweight 14" front brakes and 43mm rear calipers! I would suggest that this GTS could have improved braking from a set of Tom's rear calipers and 14" front brake kit, and adjustable proportioning valve.
I did write to Larry Macedo and he liked the car when he saw it quite a while ago.
There are several GTSs for about this price in the classifieds and another thread for a modified 650R for $40K.
Ted