Some of you may have heard of a Toyota engine field problem when many were crapping out with excesive sludge. There's an example of the oil not holding up, which may have been due to marginal oil quality, slightly extended oil drains, or something a little wrong about the engine design.
Toyota could have blamed the oil, but then they'd have to specify something better that API performance. They could have blamed the driver for delaying oil changes, but then they'd have to prove it in each case. They ended up with replacing some engines, and I believe extending the warranty period because of the bad press.
But yes, if I were a dealer I would at least submit the oil for some analysis to make sure than the oil used wasn't an API SA or SB (no additives!) quality chainsaw bar oil. A $15 test on an engine replacement might be worth it.
The point is that US OEMs have a different "stick" than Euro OEMs. In the US, OEMs dictate to the oil companies what tests go into the API service category requirements. Some are reasonable, some are silly. In the end, they win. Then they tell consumers to change the oil at 3000 miles, a huge safety margin - and why not? It's free insurance for the OEM. In Europe, the OEMs have different specs for each brand, frequently each model. Drivers essentially have to have a shop or dealer change the oil and document it, or risk not being able to sell the car later (because the purchaser will want to see the maintenance records.) In this system, cars can go for 12,000 to 15,000 miles on a drain, because it's recognized the oils are "tuned" for the engine, the service, and the drain interval. Drain intervals have become marketing tools, and nobody goes 15,001 miles.