That was my thread. The dealer is dishonest. He told me they sold that car to a local buyer when I started asking too many questions. The car has been for sale since April at least.
There were other issues with it as well.
Ron
Ron, From appearances of the seller's Facebook posts, the car appears to be for sale now by a private party in a different state. It could be a ruse by the dealer, or it could be the person who the dealer sold the car to. He posted it for sale on the VCA facebook page and is upfront about the engine replacement and the buyback.
I emailed the seller and he made no mention of any title issues or buy backs.
I would think that is dishonest of the seller, his ad didn't have the VIN, now I know why.
What, specifically, did you ask him? Did you ask him if the carfax showed a buyback or if the title showed some sort of annotation? It is not dishonest on the part of the seller to answer only the questions that you ask to be answered. It is not up to him to decide what you might care about or decide what you may have already learned about the car that is in the public domain. IMHO. By the way, his posts of the car on facebook clearly do mention the buyback, assuming that we are talking about the car that has 6500 miles, so, he is not hiding the fact.
Good luck with your search.
Some people would consider a 2014 Viper that was subject to the r28 recall and has had the engine replaced to be more desirable than a 2013 or 2014 that has not had the engine replced. IMHO.