Scrapped that project. It was going to come out WAAAY to expensive to retain the A/C, and it would not have worked with Paxton cars... would have been a very difficult to market item.
Would you consider doing one off for my TT Viper?
PM me.
Scrapped that project. It was going to come out WAAAY to expensive to retain the A/C, and it would not have worked with Paxton cars... would have been a very difficult to market item.
Thanks Daniel!
I am very impressed with your specific Viper knowledge!
Sounds like oil pressure might be OK for normal street driving but volume of oil would be insufficient under severe conditions.
Interesting observation on the swing arm pick-up; on the installed engine, in which direction will the arm move, driver's side (assuming LHD) or other side?
Maybe waiting for the 2008 model is the smarter path than try to fix what seems to be a seriously compromised situation on Gen3 engines.
Obviously, the factory knows this from experience as they must have honored a large amount of warranty claims from these built-in shortcomings (I am not quite ready to call them defects), and took the smart path by eliminating all of these issues with the 08 redesign.
Vypr Phil
Would you consider doing one off for my TT Viper?
PM me.
(PM Box Full)
Sure, I dont see why not. I cant take on a project like that during my high-season however, I would have to wait until fall. I would need input from you as well so I know what will and wont work on your car.
I also advise you to hold off for now anyway, as this 2008 system may indeed be a bullet-proof godsend...we will know soon enough. Unless you specifically wanted the crankcase vacuum of the dry sump, there isnt much reason to go with it over the 2008 system... and even vacuum pumps could solve that if really needed.
Thoughts?.
Emptied the PM box.
The reason I want the dry sump is on a 1200 RWHP TT Viper, sometimes the oil pressure drops on hard straight line accelerations if the tires mysteriously hook up. Long uphill turns are another problem. I have the comp coupe oil and it doesn’t do much for hard acceleration/braking, and long uphill/downhill.
I also need more crankcase vacuum. If the 2008 system will take care of all these, then I may settle for that but otherwise I will go with a dry sump to protect the $$$$ investment under the hood.
What other parts would have to be replaced for the 2008 oil system upgrade?
1. A comp Coupe System will help, but it has two huge downfalls: It only swings ONE direction, and the swingarm is positioned FAR forward in the pan- a big problem if you have big power. Starvation can occur under acceleration.
2. Yes, the oiling system issues on the SRT are aggravated by High-RPM.
3. The main issues is that the galleries in the system are too small (higher vacuum during pickup) the relief valve dumps right into the inlet (introducing compressued gas bubbles which expand under vacuum), and the gerotor design is wide, with too little vane volume, causing a long distance with little inlet area, which is needed to fill the vanes while the gerotor sweeps- causing vacuum even in the gerotor vanes themselves.
The new design has MUCH larger oil galleries, it has a new style relief valve, and the galleries are designed to expel air before it goes through the relief and back into the inlet. the pump is also a large volume, but the rotors are narrower, allowing easier gerotor filling.
When I installed the CC Oil Pan in my 06, the oil pickup articulated in both lateral directions (Left and Right). My car has been flawless. FYI
Flash
Scrapped that project. It was going to come out WAAAY to expensive to retain the A/C, and it would not have worked with Paxton cars... would have been a very difficult to market item.
I noticed a photograph ad in last month's Racecar Engineering magazine for an aftermarket dry-sump Viper pan that maintained the OEM A/C system. What is did NOT specify is whether it was Gen2 or Gen3 based.
Gen 2s also experienced Rod #3 starvation failures. I put 4 years and probably 2k track miles on mine before going to Joe Dozzo's hinged baffle system. I upgraded to the late-model windage tray but kept the original 7 qt. pan and the original one-hole top tray that feeds windage tray drain oil directly into the center sump. My 3-4 journals look fine after several thousand more track miles.
Apologies in advance - I did NOT forget which forum I was posting in.
A lot of the problems can be solved with more oil timing built onto the bearing. Something to think about when you have to rebuild.
I noticed that several owners with Gen II cars with forged pistons (1996-99) were deliberately running 1 qt. low on oil on the track at Viper Days. Their rationale was to avoid detonation from burning excess oil as the i guess the larger tolerances with the forged pistons can allow this to happen. My question is which is potentially more detrimental, burning excessive amounts of oil when running at speed or running 1 qt low on oil at speed.
Glad i don't seem to have either problem.
PAVenomRT/10