Bruce, thank you for the thoughtful reply. I was aware of all of the differences. I agree with most of what you say. My only point of difference is on the performance gains. With the GTS being so close in times without the aero and track alignment, it does make you wonder on the benefits of the stiffer springs and roll bars. The brakes are not that big deal as the track pack brakes are what the GEN4 ACR used so successfully for years. Anyone going to the track would get a track alignment anyways. I do like those new brake rotors though. Wish they would have a 3 mode suspension on the GTS to have the two track modes of the TA and then the street setting.
I suspected you maybe did know all the differences, but we now know were all on the same page. You stated elsewhere that you are genuinely looking to purchase a gen V, and seem to be going through a similar thought process that I did, so let's see how we used much the same information to come to different conclusions. You even just identified the same two factors that were pivotal to me...the best brakes vs the most compliant suspension. Where you're trying to minimize the value of the TA's performance features, and suggesting that others are falling for the TA's marketing to justify choosing the GTS suspension and other features, I used just as advanced rationalization techniques to choose the TA for its brakes and other features
Again, I think a great marketing effort to take some very basic parts, cheaper interior, decal emblems and a unique color, call it special and sell it for a price that most everyone was complaining about before. This is what surprised me because the performance gain was minimal, but the price a decent jump.
What is "basic" about brake capacity, sway bars, spring rates, damper valving optimized for those bars/springs/track alignment, and front and rear functional splitters? How much would it cost to buy all of those to upgrade a GTS? They'd also cost a small fortune on an SRT, you'd have to go aftermarket for suspension because the two mode Bilsteins won't work on an SRT, and you still wouldn't have all the ESC modes. Then add to that the value of the carbon fiber X-brace and rear fascia, spiffy orange accents,
and the combined value of both a lap record setting limited edition!!! I can't see it as anything but special, and an incredible value for those wanting it for all the other reasons. Not sure anyone has complained about price once they realized what it included. If somebody didn't want or care about half of the features they would think it wasn't worth it.
The "cheaper" interior is certainly less costly for the OEM, but more desirable for a track focused performance car for comfort and support. The TA still retains leather for important touch points. I bought my first sports car when I was 20 (XKE vert) with leather seats, and every car purchase since 1985, three current track cars, and even my mini van has acres of the stuff. I'm actually looking forward to cloth interior look and feel. Love the orange stitching.
To answer your questions though, the items I want are a different color, stripes, polished wheels (I personally hate the black wheels), two vent hood and the nice leather interior and the sound deadening. But make no mistake, I want it to be great on the track as well, thus I really like the brake option which is an easy add later. I think if you give Randy a GTS with track pack, aero, and track alignment, I suspect the times will be super close. This is the reason why I don't see the big performance gain, but I could be wrong and not giving enough value to the stiffer spring rates, sway bars and shock dampening.
I guess the same could be said for a base SRT model with track pack and aero for much less money. Heck, if you really wanted the best track performer for the money, you would get a new base 2013 SRT with track pack ($95k) and aero ($5k), track alignment ($200), put MCS suspension ($5k) on it and cost you 10-15k less.
So it's clear you don't like much at all about the TA, other than it's top performance, so let's not worry about its marketing or value. Buy an SRT or GTS, order and install all the Mopar and aftermarket parts that you like, and don't worry about whether it's performs as good or better than the TA.
I'm not a fan of black wheels either, particularly on a black car, and could have done the same as you are suggesting starting with a GTS. I'd have it set up exactly the way I like, with choice of color/stripes/wheels, paid extra for the SRT hood for better cooling, and could have spent a small fortune on the mods you mentioned. The worst that could have happened is that I'd have spent a small fortune on modifications, possibly still ended up with inferior performance and handling characteristics compared to the TA, and would likely only see pennies on the dollar for the mods at resale time...if I could find a buyer for it. I guess I could pay to put it back to stock again to sell it to an unsuspecting buyer. Of course I still wouldn't have had the performance interior that I want, and spent all my time researching, installing, and testing mods. I did promise myself I'd never go that route again, and simply buy the car that offered the performance I wanted.
I got over my dislike of black wheels on a black car in about 24 hours when I considered the package as a whole. It's certainly the most practical color scheme for my track use as far as hiding tire marble marks. Reviews of the TA indicate that ride quality is somewhere between acceptable and quite good, naturally subject to road surface, and I'm getting the brakes I really, really wanted. Ralph Gilles, Randy Pobst and Graham Hecknell all personally recommended the TA for my combined street and track use with endurance sessions up to 90 minutes back in March and April, in part for those brakes. I don't think I was swayed by marketing at all, but rather good feedback from those who know the cars best.
To clarify, I am not trying to put down the TA. Some of my comments may suggest that I am, but just truly trying to understand as I think the marketing has been great to suggest big performance increases, but the data does not show that for all of us reading the same facts.
I think your comments help make a very strong case for the TA for its very high performance. It would take a lot of time and money to try to match or beat it in order to have a wider choice of non-performance colors and such. Those who do like the look and features of the TA should also consider the aspects of performance beyond a lap time. You're not likely going to be trying to beat Randy's record lap around Laguna Seca, but you may appreciate the improvements to car control and driver confidence that he found apparent compared to the production SRT and GTS, and the impressive performance that every reviewer of the TA has enthusiastically reported.
We're very lucky to have such a good choice of Vipers and options to choose from for our varying needs. We should all be excited about the models that we prefer rather than being critical of models we don't.
Bruce