Next Phase
Enthusiast
What ***** is that SRT isn't taking the Gen V to the ring until someone takes the title away from the ACR (Coming from Ralph Gilles himself). I'm really surprised no one has put up a faster time yet.
So what if the ACR holds the record on the ring; it most likely scared the living **** out of the drivers and says nothing about the fact that Vipers get their rears handed to them on a regular basis by 'lesser' cars on track days and auto-x events such as the 911's, GT-R's and lowly Vettes. The ACR was a purpose-build race-car that was barely street legal. Fast but crude as a 100 year old John Deere. How many of those cars are daily drivers???
He's just trolling.Your follow up is right back at knocking Vipers , so back to my original question --- what is your purpose if you are an enthusiast.
For the most part, new Vipers are only expensive compared to earlier generation Vipers.
Compared to equally performing sports cars they are pretty reasonable.
Not too sure the price of the Viper is going up, as much as the value of the dollar is going down. For people paying in Euro's they are even more of a bargain.
So what if the ACR holds the record on the ring; it most likely scared the living **** out of the drivers and says nothing about the fact that Vipers get their rears handed to them on a regular basis by 'lesser' cars on track days and auto-x events such as the 911's, GT-R's and lowly Vettes. The ACR was a purpose-build race-car that was barely street legal. Fast but crude as a 100 year old John Deere. How many of those cars are daily drivers???
[ the fact that Vipers get their rears handed to them on a regular basis by 'lesser' cars on track days and auto-x events such as the 911's, GT-R's and lowly Vettes.]
It's a poor craftsmen who blames his tools, as others have stated above. And Vettes aren't lowly, just not as connected or exciting as Vipers IMO and they certainly do have other strengths. I could fit a 3/4 sized string bass into mine, but thats another story...
In any case, my purpose in posting to another Vette owner was simply to convey my experience with the Viper as it seems that you have not driven one (or ridden from the sounds of things) and I explain that the experience of driving one is much more than you might expect based upon reading magazine articles and the numerous myths that exist about the car.
You are correct, it is a difficult car to drive and that is part of the appeal. You could own a Viper for 3 or 4 years and still have much to learn about it's limits and capabilities. Not a car that you master in 6-12 months, get bored, and start looking for something else (such as a porsche boxster and maybe the GTR).
Also, the GTR is an impressive performer, though the amazing 0-60 times come with the price of voiding your warranty. The best 0-60 time I've seen published with the new launch control that doesn't void the warranty is 3.8 seconds, quite a bit longer than the 3.0 or 3.2 that is usually published. Also, my buddy has run 4 or 5 from a roll with his Z06 and has taken everyone of them, though he has not run a 2012 or later. Definitely fast off the line.
In any case, the computerized nature of the GTR is not my style. Plus six years of C5 vette ownership will turn you off to any sports car packed with technology, one more reason I like the Base SRT Viper so much.
As I said before, decide on the car you like best, doesn't seem like the Viper is what you want and why should anyone convince you otherwise?
-Nick
I hate to say it, but I'm starting to come around on the pricing a little more. I may have been one of the bigger critics of the price point, but it is hard to ignore that it is bang for the buck when compared to its competitors. I still think it is a little too high, but if people actually pay it, then it is worth it. I honestly think that these steep increase in prices occurred only because as the dollar dropped to almost half of a euro, we saw imports like Mercedes and BMW pricing in dollars sky rocket. Other automakers saw this and followed suit. Difference is, now that they are getting the money, regardless of euro decline, pricing held steady. Things are going my way to get a gen V and I think I will. I will wait to see what the new SSG that Ralph talked about looks like and I want to see the ACR first though.
This.
And this. I will however be sorely disappointed if SRT does not release some sort of radical widebody ACR. ONLY because we've seen how much potential the body style has. GTS to GTS-R is greater than the sum of it's parts. Put $30k in parts (arbitrary) and get $300k in looks and performance.
You should check the definition a car forum ALL opinions are welcome whether you like or not.Complaints and comparissons with other cars has been here for a while and it grew silly and stupid for me long ago. I only had to read a couple of posts here and now I am saying this: THIS IS VIPER CLUB NOT ANY OTHER CAR CLUB AND THIS IS GEN V FORUM NOT ANYTHING ELSE.
If you keep whining about price, front grill, blah blah blah and talking about other brands, then get a grip of yourselves dramaqueens and go talk in the vettes/ferraris forums. blind me but the car is about to arrive and yet you find some none viper owners talking like their openion matters! you are not even intrested this much in the car.
SRT seems to be right on for base price. GTS base is $12,000 too expensive and the option prices are just a too excessive for what you get. $5.5K for stripes that would cost a body shop $1,000. I paid $3,000 for them on my GEN III from the factory and thought that was outrageous. Yes the new GEN GTS is too expensive and yes the OP and myself at the moment, could probably not afford one. Then again the car seems to be targeted towards the silver spooners and trust funders when you look a a full load GTS with gas guzzler, etc. at a total cost of almost 50% more than the outgoing GEN. I would say that is excessive. To say not, well you don't seem to worry about money. If you worked hard for it all your life, I have the utmost respect for you and I applaud you. If not, well............
Well said. I've been killing myself at work for the last 4 years almost trying to get my family on the best possible financial path. The Viper was supposed to be for me. It was/is in my plan to get one and fulfill a dream I've had since I was 10. It ***** that now I have to pay almost 50% more than I would've on a gen IV just because it has all the stuff it should have had all along at $100k. Oh well...
Don't tell them that, they'll try to charge it. I do agree the Gen V should cost more than a Gen IV, but skyrocketing past the cost of a Gen IV ACR was what bothered me. I still feel the base price on the SRT should have been $95k and GTS at $110k. Oh well, whats 10-11% more right?
I'm thinking that you are not aware of Woodhouse Dodge or Bill P. for that matter. Many advertise a used Viper, as Woodhouse delivered, as a selling point even.Well Bill, I get a kick out of people who buy cars solely because of what that car did on a particular track, then blast others when they challenge that decision with objective facts from a plethora of trade 'rags'. I may have only 8 or so posts here, but rest assured, based on your arrogant post, IF I decide to buy a Viper, I surely won't be calling your dealership. You really should think before you post.
So what if the ACR holds the record on the ring; it most likely scared the living **** out of the drivers and says nothing about the fact that Vipers get their rears handed to them on a regular basis by 'lesser' cars on track days and auto-x events such as the 911's, GT-R's and lowly Vettes. The ACR was a purpose-build race-car that was barely street legal. Fast but crude as a 100 year old John Deere. How many of those cars are daily drivers???
But hey, if that's your deal or what causes your customers to write their deposit checks (we'll see how many of them actually follow through), more power to y'all.
I started this thread stating that I was very interested in the Gen V but somewhat dismayed at the pricing of the GTS model. Many responded with intelligent posts and to those people, I thank you. I personally feel the new car is beautiful & has tremendous potential.
I drive my ACR everywhere I can, on my city's frost-heaved roads. Not a problem. I just don't take it to work because it draws too much attention. It's also obvious that you haven't a clue about driving the ACR either. Driving it at 8/10ths it will destroy most other cars going 10/10ths on the road or track, and you won't even break a sweat.
Driven harder and you will be alert but not scared unless you are in over your head...the ACR's limits are so high and the car so well behaved that it is almost too easy to go fast fearlessly. Having 1000lbs of downforce at 150mph on Pilot Sport Cups gives the ACR an almost unfair advantage. Go ahead and make John Deere comments all you want, that's a hater's game...comments like that are usually muttered by the guys choking on the dust left behind in the Viper's wake.
Well said. I've been killing myself at work for the last 4 years almost trying to get my family on the best possible financial path. The Viper was supposed to be for me. It was/is in my plan to get one and fulfill a dream I've had since I was 10. It ***** that now I have to pay almost 50% more than I would've on a gen IV just because it has all the stuff it should have had all along at $100k. Oh well...