As far a Maurice being "invited" back, yes, he was technically told he could come back, but did you read the letter? It was more of a "we think we overstepped our bounds in getting rid of you, so to avoid being sued, you can come back" than a "we want you back" letter. I don't blame him for declining in the least bit. Why step into a mess that doesn't really seem to want you anyway? At least that's the way I read it. Maybe some other people should take note of his actions and think about their place in all of this.
TowDawg,
Opinions vary but here are the facts:
Below is the memo I wrote to Maurice my first day in office. He had been suspended for 1 day at that time. And to clear the record, I was advised by our attorney that the prior president screwed up the "suspension procedure" for Maurice only, so he may not have been legally suspended. When I learned of this, I decided on my own to let him know for two reasons:
1 - I thought that recent actions could have some repercussions. I also thought he could help us move forward and hoped he would consider joining our group in trying to rebuild the club; and
2 - If he was not planning to return to the VCA, as a courtesy to a friend, he should know that he could incur legal liability if he tried to recruit members from the VCA to a new venture as VCA officer. I've known Maurice for a long time and he was a great help to me when I took over as So Cal Region President. We did some joint events together and generally got along pretty well. I viewed this action as how one friend should treat another. Both of us tried to get a number of changes made during our time on the board together and neither of us could accomplish some of our goals. We were both a bit frustrated with the status quo. While we did not always agree on the small stuff, I think we always shared a common vision of doing what we thought was best for the members.
__________________________________________________________________________
Maurice,
This may come as a surprise to you, but you know how “hard headed” I can be with the facts, just as I know how “hard headed” you can be with perception and tone. Either way, right is right and rule of law should prevail. As usual, the best solution is usually somewhere in the middle.
I planned to bring this up at our meeting tonight and would bet that you will be re-instated in some way. Not sure exactly what position you’ll be re-instated for as Lee named a secretary. I surely won’t be the one to suspend you and will support your re-instatement and future involvement at whatever level we can work out. I hope you will accept.
As an aside, I know how important your next year’s Nor Cal Club party is to you and I would hate to screw that up for you. That would be like making Jon B miss a VOI, which we did and some of us now regret. Remember when I proposed that you and I meet with Jon in SF to try and get him back into our group months ago? I (we) could never get Lee to go along.
I would ask you to please sign a properly executed COI form (as I’ve asked in the past) and decide which position you wish to hold, either Regional President or ?
In any case, I’ll let you know what our new team decides.
You know me well enough to know that I’m not afraid of a fight. I do wish it could be avoided though. A prolonged battle causes casualties on both sides and would not be in the best interests of the membership and believe it or not, I have no desire to be President, never have. Perhaps we could work together to get this club back on the right track? Alex could be helpful too. I always enjoyed debating him and will miss that.
Acting President for almost a day now.
Regards,
Dan