SnakeBitten
Enthusiast
- Joined
- May 18, 2001
- Posts
- 2,550
- Reaction score
- 0
You are correct, it is a shame we have to cheat, what makes it double bad is that all the ZR1's and ZO6's that ran tens did so with only a good wax job and run flats.
You might need to believe "all" the Vettes cheated to get the 10's and that's fine. The bottom line is the Viper can be made to be just as great on the drag strip as it is in the corners. It once was until the competitions technology negated that advantage. Look at the ZR1. Its right there in the twisties with the outgoing ACR at Laguna, albeit on better MPSC's than the '10 ACR ran with, while its still engineered to be very good at the 1/4 as well. GM made the ZR1 to cater to the road course and straight lining. Their focus was an all around great sports car whereas SRT's focus with the Viper is road course dominance.
I'm not saying the Viper needs to be great at both to be relevant, just responding to the idea that the Viper can only be made to be a road course car at the expense of straight line prowess. Thats preposterous as the ZR1, Mclaren MP4 clearly shows. Obviously the budget isn't there for LC etc on par with the Mclaren but surely shocks that can allow both squat for 1/4 miling and proper valving to carve up the road course is extremely viable. It comes down to what SRT's focus is and its road course only it seems. No problem. But its plainly obvious that it could be engineered to do both extremely well if they had the desire and budget to do so. As I mentioned before if they had to choose only one performance parameter between the two Im glad they chose handling over straight line ability. It would be nice to see them add the other aspect in the future with a good LC and suspension engineering. Why not?
Last edited: