I ask because something happened to me today that I am still trying to make sense of.
So some background, I bought some 1999 Viper ACR BBS authentic rims for my 1996 RT/10 we just got a few weeks ago and went to Discount Tire for new PS2s. They gave me a screaming deal on them at $1,650 all taxes, mounted, and balanced in, plus I get the Michelin $70 rebate.
The day we are off to the hospital for labor with our son, on the way a Regional Discount Tire VP calls me and says I am sorry we can not sell you those Michelins for your 1996 Viper due to sidewall rating issues, different car weights, etc. I went off a little (mostly due to my wife's labor and getting to the hospital on time) saying the cars are only 50 to 75 lbs apart for those years and this is crazy. I then cut him off and just told him we would square up and figure it out when I get back.
Well birth went great and we have a happy, healthy baby boy. My wife is doing great as well. I also had a moment today on way o get groceries so I called the Discount store by my house where we were buying from. They tell me to come in. The store manager apologizes a couple of times saying this is their (Discount's concern) fault and they just can not mount those on my rims and put the wheels on my car. The issue was raised on their end to their SVP. After their own discussions with Michelin and Discount tire, Michelin and Discount's performance tire division together starting quoting, side load, toe in, weight balance issues, etc. with that tire and size on an earlier than 1999-2002 Viper and Discount just said they would not accept the liability. The local store manager also expressed that Discount had some issues with previous sales in this situation which there were issues.
Then the strange thing. Discount refunded me all my money back and said we are sorry this is our fault AND gave me the new tires for free to have someone else mount them. They said they do not want to lose a valuable customer over the past 15 years at this location (tires for my 5 vehicles) and Discount's inability to accept the liability of the situation after discussions with Michelin, is not my fault.
Now I have never in all my years come across this. Awesome I got a set of new tires for nothing, but I just feel absolutely wrong about everything. Then I started to think, how bad must this Michelin/Viper situation and relationship be that Discount would sooner give away a set of tires for free after consult with Michelin, then accept the liability of them even being mounted.
Something tells me there is much, much more behind the Michelin relationship fall out then any of us will ever know. Anyone ever had something like this happen before. I just can not make sense of this all? Corporate America I guess. The local Discount has a customer for life in me, but it just seems like there is so much more behind this.
So some background, I bought some 1999 Viper ACR BBS authentic rims for my 1996 RT/10 we just got a few weeks ago and went to Discount Tire for new PS2s. They gave me a screaming deal on them at $1,650 all taxes, mounted, and balanced in, plus I get the Michelin $70 rebate.
The day we are off to the hospital for labor with our son, on the way a Regional Discount Tire VP calls me and says I am sorry we can not sell you those Michelins for your 1996 Viper due to sidewall rating issues, different car weights, etc. I went off a little (mostly due to my wife's labor and getting to the hospital on time) saying the cars are only 50 to 75 lbs apart for those years and this is crazy. I then cut him off and just told him we would square up and figure it out when I get back.
Well birth went great and we have a happy, healthy baby boy. My wife is doing great as well. I also had a moment today on way o get groceries so I called the Discount store by my house where we were buying from. They tell me to come in. The store manager apologizes a couple of times saying this is their (Discount's concern) fault and they just can not mount those on my rims and put the wheels on my car. The issue was raised on their end to their SVP. After their own discussions with Michelin and Discount tire, Michelin and Discount's performance tire division together starting quoting, side load, toe in, weight balance issues, etc. with that tire and size on an earlier than 1999-2002 Viper and Discount just said they would not accept the liability. The local store manager also expressed that Discount had some issues with previous sales in this situation which there were issues.
Then the strange thing. Discount refunded me all my money back and said we are sorry this is our fault AND gave me the new tires for free to have someone else mount them. They said they do not want to lose a valuable customer over the past 15 years at this location (tires for my 5 vehicles) and Discount's inability to accept the liability of the situation after discussions with Michelin, is not my fault.
Now I have never in all my years come across this. Awesome I got a set of new tires for nothing, but I just feel absolutely wrong about everything. Then I started to think, how bad must this Michelin/Viper situation and relationship be that Discount would sooner give away a set of tires for free after consult with Michelin, then accept the liability of them even being mounted.
Something tells me there is much, much more behind the Michelin relationship fall out then any of us will ever know. Anyone ever had something like this happen before. I just can not make sense of this all? Corporate America I guess. The local Discount has a customer for life in me, but it just seems like there is so much more behind this.
Last edited: