Thoughts are, is Jay just pulled this from the only forum it would truly get exposure.
He effectively killed the oposition.
At least they are going to do Version 2.. limit stupid links.
Wow, guess its just me, but in the world of IT, you DO NOT DO DEVELOPMENT WORK IN A PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT. What about user acceptance testing? What about the communications piece?
Little Hint... I am a IT Change Manager, Communication, Coordination, Planning, Testing and Validation. They are effective actions that help mitigate BAD IT.
Ok moving on.. since now this thread will be effectively killed by lack of participation.
Jon
LOL.
How many of you noticed it had been in test on the "threaded" version of the pages (most use the flat method).... that is how we tested it... in a less visible version to look for bugs and see if it was going to be obtrusive. The problem was on that threaded version of the forums only a few words popped up underlined, it was very unobtrusive, and not nearly the quantity of words were underlined in the posts that were reviewed. So few as a matter of fact, that we were not sure it was working.
Following is what we were told, and what we saw in the testing:
Publisher Controls:
• Publisher controls on which pages the ad unit runs
• Publisher controls the number of links per page (maximum of six links per page)
• Publisher controls the number of links per paragraph
• Publisher can block or exclude advertisers from running on site
Obviously there were a LOT MORE links showing up, something that absolutely can be corrected, but caught us by complete surprise, even thought we tested for it.
As for your second comment, the introductory post was all written, it was to go up tonight. In hind site, it should have gone up last night. One thing it said, and one thing that it appears nobody seems to have found because they did not click on the "what is this" part of the links, was you can turn it off. If you click on the "what's this" and read to the bottom it has the following text:
"Do you want to disable the IntelliTXT links? Deactivation requires the use of cookie technology. If you should delete or refresh your cookies, please note that the service will be re-activated automatically. Click here to disable."
We figured, if people did not like it, they could turn it off. It does not get any better than that. We just never had the chance to tell y'all, our fault.
Would it be acceptable now that you know you can turn it off? and that we would limit the number of links per page as well as eliminate links to sites that compete against site supporters.... and as side note, we would love to add code to highlight references in posts to site sponsors. Maybe that would be a fun little programming task for the volunteer above