The GTS time posted above is a production 2013 (same day they did the TA). It did not have aero package. do not remember on the brakes/tires. Your point is super valid on the performance, just wanted to make sure you know that time was not from the original pre-production car. Heck, put the...
In just doing back of the napkin math by this list, I see the following:
Coupe 78K + perf seats 2k + aero package 10k (note it requires other option taken) + nav 2k. That does not even include the popular 3LZ package for 8k. So, just to get something reasonable for the performance minded, you...
Just highlighting the facts from the chart. Is it just me that sees 3 of the 4 top times are Vipers and 2 of them are GenV's. Go hunt for the new stingray. Go hunt for the early years of the ZR1. It does tell a more complete story.
Now, if only they were able to run a 30min test for each...
Please, look at the whole chart. The ZR1 from 5yrs ago has a much slower time. It was only the last model year that had the perf you speak of. to suggest it was 5yr tech is not accurate, atleast when coming to handling. Just saying overstating things like you are is not super helpful when...
ok, I must be missing something. One post, you pause at the 151K figure stating how high it is and now you pause at the 100k figure. price is not the issue in the comparison (relatively speaking), so just decide which car you like better by seeing in person and driving.
I guess it depends on your perspective. 3500 is heavy for a zo6 replacement as several hundred lbs heavier. Now, if you view as a zr1 replacement, then you are correct in not much difference
Yes, this was known for quite a while. adding FI is like a guaranteed +200lbs so it is amazing it is not higher. what I have not seen yet though is the weight distribution.
easy, traction from AWD and auto. Not really that impressive when you think about it that way, but the fact that pig of a car can handle with its electronics is what is amazing.
agreed. I think the difference is the others were designed with that extra weight in mind. Me personally, would rather have the car have 200lbs removed and same power but that is probably even more expensive.
While I agree with your statements below, even a smaller % of buyers know how to use the power, so really the same argument in both cases. I guess it always comes down to "bragging rights" which really does not have much logic to it, but plenty of passion.
I think what people always forget...
First step would to be for them to know what type of car they want. The point of my quote (of which you only took part) was that someone is describing how the Charger/Challenger impacts Viper sales and my point was to dispute that because they are not even in the same category of car nor are...
You put down people , the car, etc and when you get called out on anything, you resort to personal attacks.
I simply asked for the facts or logic from the statements being made. And this is yet another post where you are insulting again. You are calling someone cheap that you don't know. (so...
exactly, you do have to be in the market to figure that out. If you walk in to get a Viper, you presumably have the money to get it. at $65k challenger or charger is not going to confuse you to get that instead, unless you were never in the market for a Viper to begin with. It will only help...
I think you must be the definition of an idiot then because you really have no concept of who you are even speaking with, membership involvement, etc. But, you feel because you paid for a club membership, you are entitled to insult an owner of the car in the forum you are in when you don't have...
Just confirming, but I think the GenV forum, right. I own a GenV. Right off the bat more qualified for this forum than someone that does not. But please, keep adding your expertise and insults as I guess your club fee gives you that right.
Simply asking folks to explain their opinion with what they would actually do should not be that threatening.
But, then you call someone a cheapskate because they didn't pay an annual fee for a club where you get little in return, but instead purchased the product the entire club is formed...
sure, but folks can answer for themselves what they would do vs trying to speak for others. Would he in fact not buy a Viper and buy something else because of this? Would any of you? You can only answer if in the market, have the money, going in to get a Viper, reading this info about...
And your last answer I think calls out the disconnect. Until you know what you want to grow to, it throws many things off. Your suggestions all lead to wanting to be a corvette competitor in sales #'s (20-30k cars a year) and that clearly is NOT the goal of the Viper and never has been. My...
why would you aim your target at the Stingray? The Viper is not meant to be a corvette competitor, particularly with the base model. why would a handbuilt car be targeted at that. You would then create the problem the vette has, and that being the hi-end models don't feel hi-end because they...
actually, that was never really the stated goal for the cars. The SRT was always meant to be the less expensive car for the prior traditional Viper buyers. They never said the GTS was a GT car and in fact always said the 2mode suspension was a better performance suspension. Simple fact was...
Exactly, now we have some facts. put Aero and track alignment on the GTS and no telling how close they are.
Now add in the fact of the only cars you can buy new today in the same price range are the Gen5's (all versions) and GTR, of which neither are selling well. performance and Price is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.