Again it depends on your perspective. I like performance cars, and currently DC is leading the pack with a complete line of go-fast SRT vehicles.
Comparatively Ford has just the Mustang/Shelby holding the Fort with SVT fading away and no more quicker Focus, Lightning, and the Ford GT's production over.
Chevy has the Corvette, Trailblazer SS, and a slew of SS-badged, V8 FWD sedans.
I'm not a huge truck fan anyway except for hauling the occasional fridge and sofa when moving, and I never thought that I'd own a SUV, but my wife wanted one.
It's AWD, but that's not for rock climbing, it's for rain, and maybe some mud, and a snow trip or two in the vehicle's lifetime.
Currently I have nothing to tow so that's a moot point.
I suppose that from pure-4X4-truck point of view, Jeeps are always supposed to be some close relative to the 40's military Jeep, being high off the ground, slow, handling like crap, riding like crap, with no HP, but tons of torque for pulling stumps out of the ground.
Sure there is an older history of 4X4s and Jeeps out there, but it has little/nothing to do with offering a balanced high performance vehicle with decent towing and off-road/all weather capability. Which is exactly what the SRT-8 Jeep does well.
That may be enough to get you upset at Jeep from straying from what you believe should be their total goals, but adding performance to a SUV like the Cherokee is the
only part that makes the vehicle compelling to me beyond ordinary trucks.
Performance trucks and SUVs are anything but an anomoly, with the Lightning setting the path years ago, and the SRT-10 RAM setting it's own standard. And while those pickups are probably a better fit from your towing/off-road perspective, they are still too much gigantic and heavy trucks for my taste in being a reasonably driving, usable performance vehicle.
The X5, Cayenne Turbo, ML63, and others are offering performance SUVs that aren't ungainly, slow, gargantuan Hummers. And the SRT-8 Jeep matches their performance for a fraction of the price.
Does DC need to concentrate on making the Viper more competitive? Sure, and I think that offering a line-up of SRT performance vehicles from the Caliber to the Magnum, to the Challenger, to the Jeep, means that building performance cars (like the Viper) are important company-wide.
Jeep and Dodge still build a WIDE line-up of 4X4, diesel, off-road, towing beasts for those so inclined. In the same way that you can buy a base Caliber if you are looking for a practical economy car. But having SRT performance models means that they can also interest people like me, who look for performance as a qualifier right along with the vehicles
other attributes.
If it is all just marketing fluff, and they abandon the Viper next year and instead add a 4-cylinder SRT Compass to the lineup then I'll be pissed right along with you.
But for now I think that things are looking up.