SnakeBitten
Enthusiast
- Joined
- May 18, 2001
- Posts
- 2,550
- Reaction score
- 0
Jay, that *****!
The Gen IV seems to have the same looks of the Gen III (besides cosmetic crap). That I don't like. It probably makes it a Gen III.5
Did anyone notice that for the first time, the Viper makes less torque than hp! I thought that was the signature Viper experience, earth moving torque.
We need to get Bob Lutz back!
It seems that that is the tradeoff with variable valve timing tech...Most cars with it have less torque than HP....This isnt so bad though...It could have been like the S2000 and have 160tq while making 250hp lol....Cant wait to see what this new snake does numbers wise....Wonder if it went on a diet...Doesnt look so at a glance...Glad they got rid of the run craps...That alone should drop the weight and have better ride/handling...
Variable valve timing has nothing to do with cars having less torque then HP. It has been used mostly, in the past on small engines allowing them to at least make some torque on the bottom end and still make high HP at faster engine speeds. VVT will always result into better use of the engine, by allowing different cam profiles to be used at different engine speeds. As long as it is reliable it's always a win/win. The tuning can be more difficult, but people have been tuning vvt engines forever.
I stand corrected but I wasnt talking from an engineers point of view...Just typing out loud that it seems seemed to me like every VVT car Ive ever seen has always had less torque than hp..I cant think of any NA motor with VVT that has more torque than hp...