WSJ reports a 35 million dollar bid for the Viper brand by Joseph Moch Sr, and Joseph Moch Jr. Anyoone know what's up with that?
Article - WSJ.com
Article - WSJ.com
What do you guys think will happen to the availability of parts for our cars? I mean, I would think this is going to drastically increase the price for parts and trying to find parts in the future will be very difficult. I would really love to get a GTS but I am a little hesitant b/c of what is going on. Any insight.
It looks like the current bid is $5.5 million by Scott Devon, owner of cole's quality foods and Devon motorworks. I don't know, but $5.5 mil seems like a bargain. I would think the ability to sell parts alone would be worth the price.
I assume they would only want to buy the name and leave the debt and liabilities to Chrysler, but what about sold orders and the cars currently under production? And will there be a forced sale of assets?
Guys i think it all goes a little deeper-further than the above(PAST HISTORY) as the Gen 4s did not sell well (dealers have been sitting on certain new cars for 17-18 months )so ANY consideration to buy the VIPER BRAND MUST include the production of the Gen 5 which the R&D has already been done for.
It done YEARS in advance .Take the Ford GT for example first model year was 2005 yet MUCH of the R&D was done by 2003 Coletti actually purchased 2002 360S to benchmark with .Bad,
How did you come to find out that R&D is complete for a GEN.5 Viper..Kevin
Penske! Penske! Penske! How does the Penske-Saturn-Viper sound?
It done YEARS in advance .Take the Ford GT for example first model year was 2005 yet MUCH of the R&D was done by 2003 Coletti actually purchased 2002 360S to benchmark with .
The work is done and has been for some time.Look at it like this in a few months the Gen 4 motor design is 3 years old and the body style ect dates back to 2003 .If they started the R&D today ITS 3-4 YEARS AWAY from being produced whick is equal to 2013-2014. As i posted previously it takes many years to develop a new model =if it isnot done there is no Gen 5.It doesn't necessarily mean that they've been working on it. Since they were not going to build it after the '09MY due to pending new crash standards I'm sure all development was either slowed or stopped.
At a sticker price ALREADY in mid 90s whats the difference of a few grand?Even if they build it, it will be subject to the new higher fuel standards which means a bigger gas guzzler tax = mucho more $$$
I love the internet.
It doesn't necessarily mean that they've been working on it. Since they were not going to build it after the '09MY due to pending new crash standards I'm sure all development was either slowed or stopped.
I believe the auto makers know of the govt standards YEARS in advance.In reference to the Ford GT Ford knew the car could not pass the Govt Standards (rear end )mandated in 2007 way back when the R&D WAS DONE in the early 2000s thet were content with only a two year run.With the government-backed Fiat purchase, and the fact that the courts seem to be setting all kinds of previously-impossible legal precedents these days, it wouldn't surprise me to see crash test standards relaxed in a big way. Just think - how much would it cost to make those tiny Fiat 500's pass the crash tests? I'd think that the feds would be very agreeable when manufacturers start crying about how hard it is to hit CAFE standards and still meet crash test guidelines...