In the end, I hope the new GEN V (if we have such a thing) will remedy some of these QA/QC issues. Though "NO" car is perfect, the $100K+ range is a different animal to compete in as opposed to a $75K range. All new jigs, moulds, etc. for the new car need to be created from scratch, so it is a chance for Dodge to get it right and bring up the Quality/Product standards. I have confidence they will get it right if they produce a new car. Nobody goes 1/2 way on their halo car right?
The Final Editions coming out will get bought and sold no matter the quality so what are we arguing about here?. Yes it would be nice to have the perfect car, but then again I am going to drive it and it will no longer be perfect, so if there is a flaw, they need to just make it right financially. Bought my 06' Coupe brand new with 17 miles right out of the showroom for $75K, so any argument I may have had with my paint was irrelevent. Had I paid MRSP, I woud have been talking to the dealership about a financial restitution.
Delearships matching up these new metallic paints, you have a better chance of hitting the lottery than a perfect repaint or match with an owner that is upset to start with. Not the dealer's fault, it is just the newer paints. Also define paint issue? I bought a brand new 07' Jeep SRT8 where the factory primer was showing in the door jams because of extremely poor paint from the factory. Would have rusted out in few years with winter driving and I could not get anything from Dodge as they would not even spray the inner jams to make sure they were covered. NOT a Viper thing, it is a Corporate Dodge thing. In fact, the GM paint jobs are just as bad as the orange peel is horendous, even on the new ZR1. I have to give it up to Ford though as they seem to have really stepped up the paint quality on their newer cars and they really needed to becuase they were bad before.
Sorry but the argument of "this is American hand built by Americans". I would pull that statement as it is not saying much for us Americans if we tolerate imperfection as such. Clearly the QA/QC is not at a high enough standard for the $100K+ buyer. The cars took forever to get out the less that 2000 cars a year, so there is no excuse for poor quality. Obviously time crunch volume sales don't play into the formula. Dodge needs to change it's standards minimums, especially for the Viper.
In the end, it is what it is, as the cars are built. GEN V really needs to have quality stepped up to be successful. Too many alternatives out there now. It is not 1992 anymore when it was pretty much the only game in town.
Don't confuse designing and engineering the perfect car with building it. Those are two totally different aspects and are always treated seperately when dialing in QA/QC. Successful QA/QC is always treated third party to the process as it needs to be unbaised and just look at the facts. Results are to be fed back into manufacturing process to make it better. Just because something was assembled poorly, doesn't mean it was engineered and designed poorly. Haven't you been to IKEA before?
The Final Editions coming out will get bought and sold no matter the quality so what are we arguing about here?. Yes it would be nice to have the perfect car, but then again I am going to drive it and it will no longer be perfect, so if there is a flaw, they need to just make it right financially. Bought my 06' Coupe brand new with 17 miles right out of the showroom for $75K, so any argument I may have had with my paint was irrelevent. Had I paid MRSP, I woud have been talking to the dealership about a financial restitution.
Delearships matching up these new metallic paints, you have a better chance of hitting the lottery than a perfect repaint or match with an owner that is upset to start with. Not the dealer's fault, it is just the newer paints. Also define paint issue? I bought a brand new 07' Jeep SRT8 where the factory primer was showing in the door jams because of extremely poor paint from the factory. Would have rusted out in few years with winter driving and I could not get anything from Dodge as they would not even spray the inner jams to make sure they were covered. NOT a Viper thing, it is a Corporate Dodge thing. In fact, the GM paint jobs are just as bad as the orange peel is horendous, even on the new ZR1. I have to give it up to Ford though as they seem to have really stepped up the paint quality on their newer cars and they really needed to becuase they were bad before.
Sorry but the argument of "this is American hand built by Americans". I would pull that statement as it is not saying much for us Americans if we tolerate imperfection as such. Clearly the QA/QC is not at a high enough standard for the $100K+ buyer. The cars took forever to get out the less that 2000 cars a year, so there is no excuse for poor quality. Obviously time crunch volume sales don't play into the formula. Dodge needs to change it's standards minimums, especially for the Viper.
In the end, it is what it is, as the cars are built. GEN V really needs to have quality stepped up to be successful. Too many alternatives out there now. It is not 1992 anymore when it was pretty much the only game in town.
Don't confuse designing and engineering the perfect car with building it. Those are two totally different aspects and are always treated seperately when dialing in QA/QC. Successful QA/QC is always treated third party to the process as it needs to be unbaised and just look at the facts. Results are to be fed back into manufacturing process to make it better. Just because something was assembled poorly, doesn't mean it was engineered and designed poorly. Haven't you been to IKEA before?
Last edited: