Re: swirl removal
yesh im outta control..lol
i used it ALL of last year and HATED it. tired of the 17 steps to a good look for a short time.
i think the new LG stuff is gonna bring it back to the top. it REALLY is good stuff. im not old enough to know the old LG stuff but this stuff he has now is great in MY opinion. $150 is NOT a lot of cash to have a good product for YOUR BABY..expecially if it lasts waaay longer. doller per wash, this stuff is prolly cheaper.
Hmmmm, you may want to stock up now. Look what I came across in my research of Teflon.
I am also unsure what these 17 steps you are referring to are. If you paint is prepped properly which it should be for just about any product you use the only steps I do are...
1.) Wipe on
2.) Wipe off
3.) Optional - A quick mist & wipe with Z8 or any QD to give it that little extra kick and remove anything I may have missed with the wipe off step.
I also do think it is a noticable difference over any other product and the fact that half my nieghborhood is now using Zaino after driving by and seeing my cars testament to the fact.
-DuPont sued in Teflon class action case
By Matt Daily
HOUSTON (Reuters) - Two Florida law firms said on Tuesday they had filed
class action lawsuits against DuPont Co., charging the giant chemicals
producer hid the potential health hazards of its Teflon nonstick
cookware coatings.
The lawsuits, the first seeking class action status and lodged on behalf
of consumers of Teflon against E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co., were filed by
Kluger, Peretz, Kaplan & Berlin PL and Oppenheim Pilelsky PA in federal
courts in several states.
The plaintiffs are calling for DuPont to pay damages to class members,
create a fund for medical monitoring of consumers who purchased products
containing Teflon and put warning labels on cookware with Teflon.
"The class of potential plaintiffs could well contain almost every
American that has purchased a *** or pan coated with DuPont's nonstick
coating," plaintiff's lawyer Alan Kluger said in a press statement.
In May, DuPont said it had received a subpoena from the U.S. Justice
Department's Environmental Crimes Section to turn over documents about
perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a chemical used to make Teflon coatings.
That came a month after DuPont agreed to settle allegations by the U.S
Environmental Protection Agency that it had failed to disclose health
data about PFOA for two decades. The company has set aside $15 million
to cover that settlement, which has not yet been finalized.
DuPont shares registered no impact from the news of the new suits,
trading up 0.6 percent or 24 cents at $43.92 per share in afternoon
dealings on the New York Stock Exchange.
"This is not a surprise to investors," said David Begleiter, chemicals
analyst with Deutsche Bank, who does not own the stock. "It was a
natural evolution of the recent events at the EPA."
In an e-mail statement, DuPont said it would vigorously defend itself
against the allegations in the lawsuit.
"Consumers using products sold under the Teflon brand are safe. Cookware
coated with DuPont Teflon nonstick coatings does not contain PFOA,"
DuPont spokesman Clif Webb said in the statement.
PFOA, also known as C-8, is used in the process of making Teflon. Tests
by 3M Co., the original manufacturer of PFOA, have shown high levels of
exposure to the chemical may cause liver damage and reproductive
problems in rats.
PFOA can remain in humans for up to four years, according to the EPA,
and small amounts of the chemical are found in a large proportion of the
general U.S. public.
In September, Dupont agreed to pay $85 million to residents in West
Virginia and Ohio to settle a lawsuit over the release of PFOA into the
water supply at its Washington Works plant in West Virginia.
(Additional reporting by David Brinkerhoff in New York)