<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Bugeater:
The reason I wanted to confirm is that this was stated in
a conversation with Heffner regarding the cast pistons. He said
the danger is when hitting up against the rev limiter, the fuel shuts off creating alot of heat, under boost >>> piston failure.
He recommended against using the cast piston. I dont know if this should be interpreted as a must-change for all boost applications. We were talking the base system fyi (6psi).
Mr Heffner, Mr Levin...?
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>I would commend your mechanics decision to suggest alternative provisions, quite simply; Making it live.
Cast pistons can be utilized for performance building, but their integrity can be compromised in sever-duty applications. The high position ring land is subjected to extreme temperatures and microscopic pieces of piston material get hot enough to weld to the top ring. Once that occurs, the ring seal becomes degraded and power is lost. Detonation which involves too rapid a rate of energy release produces excessive pressures and temperatures in the combustion chamber; these high pressures and temperatures can damage cast pistons (yes, and brake away the ring land or flake off pieces of aluminum) in no time. It's not just the fuel cut off at 6,250 rpm that effects cast pistons, It's the byproduct of the "over-rev" that may cause the skirt on the piston to crack and work its way to the top, eventually catastrophic engine failure is inevitable.
Our policy on boost levels is not necessarily the boost level number, we refer to the "CFM" as part of the many mitigating factors along with the proper initial tuning to combat any ill-effects to the engine internals on a cast piston/supercharged application.
- I hope this was helpful.
Regards,
Doug