Let's face it, that was a stupid video. Good intentions, bad experiences with the bimmerforums, or a speech impediment notwithstanding, it was a stupid video by any criteria. And stupid videos are flamebait. So if you post bad videos and say ridiculous things on a regular basis (as even the OP admits), there will be reaction.
Why stupid? Leaving aside the shaky handheld, bad commentary, and key chime, what defines a good analysis of interior quality? Rapping on BOTH doors to prove they are not leather, as if one would be different than the other? Oh, and he went back to rap on the first door to really drive the point home. Or an evaluation of ergonomics, fit, finish, visibility, seat comfort, etc? For example, Twister made no mention of the fact the yellow exterior paint of the car was visible through the huge gap at the lower edge of the passenger door.
In the end, it IS apples and oranges. The Acura was a "gentleman's sportscar" intended for those with money to look cool on a date or something. Although there are always some who rework everything, and there are plenty of fast and oft-tracked NSX's, that is not the norm as it is for the Viper. So of course it has a plush, all-leather interior. And that drives home the point that the video is useless at its most basic level, the one of necessity.
Finally, the comments about speech impediment and hearing issues: yeah nothing will cut through
like revelation of a disability. Sorry for that. But that really is a minor part of the video as a whole, and it does nothing to justify the mindset of the post.