RoadiJeff
Viper Owner
Okay, so I've been hearing about how good Grundy is on the VCA and how reasonable their prices are. Since my car insurance company keeps bumping up the rates on my Viper every year I decided to check them out.
I received their application via email last week. One of the provisions is that the vehicle will not be used to drive to school or work. I'm okay with that. On the application I had to list any "regular transportation vehicles for each driver." As many of you know I ride a bicycle. A lot. Back and forth to work. 55 miles round trip. I enjoy the heck out of it. I listed my 2007 Chrysler Sebring and my Trek as my daily transportation vehicles.
Today, I received a rejection letter from Grundy. Apparently, my list of daily transportation vehicles was inadequate. Huh?
I'm finished with Grundy. It was only a savings of $75/yr anyway. I don't want any futher frustration if this is what I can expect from them in the future.
Here's their rejection letter and my reply I just finished writing.
Grundy Worldwide
400 Horsham Rd.
P.O. Box 1957
Horsham, PA 19044
Re: Application for Collector Vehicle Insurance
Dear Grundy,
I am writing in response to my 1999 Dodge Viper RT/10 insurance application being declined because of inadequate daily transportation. Just what type of vehicle is considered adequate anyway?
On my application in the List regular transportation vehicles for each driver section I listed the two vehicles that I take back and forth to work: a 2007 Chrysler Sebring and a 2002 Trek bicycle. Please explain why the Sebring isn’t good enough for Grundy to be considered a daily driver. I only included the bicycle because I ride it 55 miles round trip to work as much or more often than I drive the Sebring. A bicycle is defined as being a vehicle, according to the Department of Transportation. I was only being honest by including it in the list.
I’m sorry if the mindset of Grundy is that all Americans are lazy and that bicycles cannot be considered to be a legitimate form of transportation but you need to expand your narrow-minded thinking if that’s the case. At any rate I did list the Sebring, which is certainly adequate daily transportation, even for lazy people.
You have lost a potential customer in your oversight. If your application review personnel missed reading the Sebring and somehow just saw the Trek bicycle listed I can only wonder what kind of oversight they would make if I ever had to file a claim.
I received their application via email last week. One of the provisions is that the vehicle will not be used to drive to school or work. I'm okay with that. On the application I had to list any "regular transportation vehicles for each driver." As many of you know I ride a bicycle. A lot. Back and forth to work. 55 miles round trip. I enjoy the heck out of it. I listed my 2007 Chrysler Sebring and my Trek as my daily transportation vehicles.
Today, I received a rejection letter from Grundy. Apparently, my list of daily transportation vehicles was inadequate. Huh?
I'm finished with Grundy. It was only a savings of $75/yr anyway. I don't want any futher frustration if this is what I can expect from them in the future.
Here's their rejection letter and my reply I just finished writing.
You must be registered for see images
October 24, 2009
Grundy Worldwide
400 Horsham Rd.
P.O. Box 1957
Horsham, PA 19044
Re: Application for Collector Vehicle Insurance
Dear Grundy,
I am writing in response to my 1999 Dodge Viper RT/10 insurance application being declined because of inadequate daily transportation. Just what type of vehicle is considered adequate anyway?
On my application in the List regular transportation vehicles for each driver section I listed the two vehicles that I take back and forth to work: a 2007 Chrysler Sebring and a 2002 Trek bicycle. Please explain why the Sebring isn’t good enough for Grundy to be considered a daily driver. I only included the bicycle because I ride it 55 miles round trip to work as much or more often than I drive the Sebring. A bicycle is defined as being a vehicle, according to the Department of Transportation. I was only being honest by including it in the list.
I’m sorry if the mindset of Grundy is that all Americans are lazy and that bicycles cannot be considered to be a legitimate form of transportation but you need to expand your narrow-minded thinking if that’s the case. At any rate I did list the Sebring, which is certainly adequate daily transportation, even for lazy people.
You have lost a potential customer in your oversight. If your application review personnel missed reading the Sebring and somehow just saw the Trek bicycle listed I can only wonder what kind of oversight they would make if I ever had to file a claim.
Sincerely,
Last edited: