I had posted a long time ago about a used car dealership selling me a viper 1994 rt/10 that had been wrecked. Well, now it's in the process of going to court. The owner of the dealership got a hold of the body man that fixed the Viper and may have told him to lie. I don't know. I guess the body guy has done a lot of business with him in the past. Well anyways, this body man told in his deposition that the wrecked Viper was in better condition as if it was new because of the worked he had done on it...which it isn't..look closely and paint is bad and doors don't really match. This is stuff I didn't know since I was a novice about buying cars. I learned that carfax is not a reliable source to tell about the history of the car. Of course the body man will say that cause he did the work on it. I had a hard time getting the car appraised because people didn't want to get involved. I went to this one car appraiser and he said that in the book he uses to appraise cars that the Viper wasn't listed. I have a hard time believing that because there were over 10,000 vipers made and there were cars in there that were rarer that the viper. Any thoughts on that? Well the frame of the car was damaged too, but looks like it was pulled on a rack.
This body man doesn't know what he is talking about, because as far as I know, once the frame has been damaged, it's not as good as it was originally. Does anyone have a contact in Louisville KY that could help me out on this? I need to prove that the car is not as good or better than before it got wrecked. This body man is obviously cover for the owner of the small dealership. I decided to keep the car because I can not sell the car for what I paid for it which was retail. This car dealer took me bad..and I'm not going to do that to someone else like he suggested I do. So I guess I'm stuck with the car and I'm going to see what can be done in court about it, but I need as much help as possible to prove that the viper is not worth the same as a non-wrecked viper.
Thanks guys and gals.
ab
This body man doesn't know what he is talking about, because as far as I know, once the frame has been damaged, it's not as good as it was originally. Does anyone have a contact in Louisville KY that could help me out on this? I need to prove that the car is not as good or better than before it got wrecked. This body man is obviously cover for the owner of the small dealership. I decided to keep the car because I can not sell the car for what I paid for it which was retail. This car dealer took me bad..and I'm not going to do that to someone else like he suggested I do. So I guess I'm stuck with the car and I'm going to see what can be done in court about it, but I need as much help as possible to prove that the viper is not worth the same as a non-wrecked viper.
Thanks guys and gals.
ab