Intake Air Temp question

Voice of Reason

Enthusiast
Joined
May 20, 2013
Posts
198
Reaction score
0
Location
Morton, IL
What are others seeing their IAT at compared to ambient temps? I have my DIC setup to show IAT in the center and its interesting how stop and go traffic affects it compared to an open road. On the highway I'm seeing IATs 20-25 degrees more than ambient. That's a little higher than I expected since we have a nice intake sucking air in. Are others seeing this much of an increase? Again, this increase is for open road driving, not in traffic. In traffic I see it go up a bit more than this.
 

01sapphirebob

Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Posts
4,962
Reaction score
0
Location
"OIHO"
There is still probaby hot air from under the hood finding its way in. I know on the GEN IV cars you could get a closeout panel from MOPAR to help with this problem.
 

MoparMap

VCA National President
VCA Officer
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Posts
2,497
Reaction score
306
Location
Kansas
Not that it's a direct comparison to a Viper by any means, but on my 5.7 swap in my old Dart I see similar numbers over ambient while cruising. Got a 6 Pack hood on it and a carb style intake so the air cleaner is mostly in direct air through the scoop. No close off plate though, so it can pull some under hood air. My cruise numbers are usually between 20-30 over ambient and can climb up pretty high around town in stop and go.
 

PeerBlock

Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Posts
460
Reaction score
0
I would guess that the higher temps are from the heated radiator air being blown back into the engine bay. If you don't mind going ghetto, you could probably cut it down by a few degrees by applying some type of reflective insulating material to your intake box and tube...but there's no benefit to doing so in my opinion. Pretty sure the IAT sensor is where it is on most cars, plugged into the tube that connects the air box to the intake manifold.
 

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,485
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
The short answer, the probe of the IAT sensor is hotter than the actual intake air (not by too much) because the probe itself is not totally insulted/isolated from the engine bay heat. That added heat is primarily convected and conducted heat that enters into the sensor body from the engine side of the sensor.
 

SilveRT8

Enthusiast
Joined
May 9, 2008
Posts
1,288
Reaction score
0
Location
Boucherville, Quebec, Canada
A trick I did with the SRT8 Jeep was to relocate the IAT sensor in a cooler location, closer to the CAI filter, so that the PCM would think cooler air is coming in and not retard the timing.
Since on the Viper the inlet tube is so short, I don't think we can relocate the 2 IAT sensors but maybe we could isolate them better from getting heat soaked by engine temp.
I'm no mechanix but just a tought.
 

PeerBlock

Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Posts
460
Reaction score
0
Is anyone actually noticing degraded engine performance from the IAT reading higher than ambient temps at speed? Wouldn't SRT have noticed this and compensated for it in the ECU?
 

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,485
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
High IAT = less hp. In the past CC would throw more fuel into the engine, therefore, less hp again. The G2 over 5000 rpm would routinly run 11.5 at wot when the temp was over 80 deg.



Is anyone actually noticing degraded engine performance from the IAT reading higher than ambient temps at speed? Wouldn't SRT have noticed this and compensated for it in the ECU?
 

PeerBlock

Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Posts
460
Reaction score
0
High IAT = less hp. In the past CC would throw more fuel into the engine, therefore, less hp again. The G2 over 5000 rpm would routinly run 11.5 at wot when the temp was over 80 deg.

So are you saying that the V10 would benefit from an IAT relocation/insulation mod?
 

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,485
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
If the the G5 has the same a/f versus rpm table as the previous generations it can benefit from leaning out the a/f at high rpm and wot. The G4's have seen hp gains by fooling (adding resistors) both the IAT and ECT sensors. Give Sean Roe a call and discuss it with him. This is where most of the added hp has come from on the G2 when it is tuned.

So are you saying that the V10 would benefit from an IAT relocation/insulation mod?
 

impalassed

Viper Owner
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Posts
94
Reaction score
0
Location
Natchez MS
A simple fix to combat the heat would be to install a spark plug boot/wire heat sock. They usually come in pairs, are readily available from local stores and are not to expensive. Plus you have all sorts of colors to choose from.
 

PeerBlock

Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Posts
460
Reaction score
0
A simple fix to combat the heat would be to install a spark plug boot/wire heat sock. They usually come in pairs, are readily available from local stores and are not to expensive. Plus you have all sorts of colors to choose from.

Pretty sure that the heat soak is caused by the radiant heat warming up the intake tube itself and not so much the sensor itself getting hot.
 

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,485
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
Radiant heat transfer is line of sight. I would guess at the front of the engine it is also a combination of conduction and convection. Look at my IR picture (sills) and the hot spot, that is convected heat escaping the containment

[; xQUOTE=PeerBlock;3198596]Pretty sure that the heat soak is caused by the radiant heat warming up the intake tube itself and not so much the sensor itself getting hot.[/QUOTE]
 

PeerBlock

Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Posts
460
Reaction score
0
Radiant heat transfer is line of sight. I would guess at the front of the engine it is also a combination of conduction and convection. Look at my IR picture (sills) and the hot spot, that is convected heat escaping the containment

The easiest way to understand radiant heat is to imagine a particular object as if it were a light bulb filament. The hottest under-hood part is probably going to be the headers. If you put a light in the vicinity of your headers you will see that more than just the immediate area around them is illuminated since light reflects and bounces around just like radiant heat does.

Convection is heat transfer through a fluid medium like air or water, and yes it does contribute to heat soak, especially when the car is not moving. Conduction is heat moving from one place to another through physical contact, which would not be a big issue with the IAT sensor since plastic is not a great conductor of heat and it's not touching anything particularly hot.

I bet heat-wrapping the headers would be a solid improvement for the viper, mainly just to lower the under-hood temps and to a lower extent, to improve the flow of exhaust.
 

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,485
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
I am a licensed thermogapher. I understand what you are trying to say. Convection/conduction is the bigger issue at that location. If I were to insulate/isolate the sensor the temp would drop far more then if I radiant wrapped the sensor.

What are your credentials?


The easiest way to understand radiant heat is to imagine a particular object as if it were a light bulb filament. The hottest under-hood part is probably going to be the headers. If you put a light in the vicinity of your headers you will see that more than just the immediate area around them is illuminated since light reflects and bounces around just like radiant heat does.

Convection is heat transfer through a fluid medium like air or water, and yes it does contribute to heat soak, especially when the car is not moving. Conduction is heat moving from one place to another through physical contact, which would not be a big issue with the IAT sensor since plastic is not a great conductor of heat and it's not touching anything particularly hot.

I bet heat-wrapping the headers would be a solid improvement for the viper, mainly just to lower the under-hood temps and to a lower extent, to improve the flow of exhaust.
 
Last edited:

PeerBlock

Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Posts
460
Reaction score
0
I am a licensed thermogapher. I understand what you are trying to say. Convection/conduction is the bigger issue at that location. If I were to insulate/isolate the sensor the temp would drop far more then if I radiant wrapped the sensor.

What are your credentials?

This would be an inexpensive and interesting experiment.

My credentials are that I'm consistently right - even when I'm not right.
 
OP
OP
V

Voice of Reason

Enthusiast
Joined
May 20, 2013
Posts
198
Reaction score
0
Location
Morton, IL
Bumping this back up.

I was cleaning the engine today after getting caught in the rain yesterday driving back from Road America and when I felt under the air box it feels completely sealed except for a 1.5-2" hole/tube on the underside. It must be there to drain water to prevent hydrolock because the only other thing it's doing is sucking hot air that's blowing directly at it from the radiator. I think I'm going to take the entire box off tomorrow to get some measurements, I'd like to find a rubber cap to put over it that's easily removable so I can pull it off quickly if/when I ever get caught in the rain again. Any guesses how that will lower the temps?
 

PeerBlock

Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Posts
460
Reaction score
0
I'd like to find a rubber cap to put over it that's easily removable so I can pull it off quickly if/when I ever get caught in the rain again. Any guesses how that will lower the temps?

It wouldn't, because the air entering the intake box is higher in pressure and cooler due to the hood scoop. Any warm air from the radiator would be displaced.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
153,595
Posts
1,684,845
Members
18,160
Latest member
Nocluehow
Top