Viperfreak2
Enthusiast
Just got Motor Trend Jan 2005 issue. Why are the auto rags so bias against the SRT-10?
In the mag there's an article on the SLR McLaren. Cool. In a sidebar, they list the 'fastest' cars as a comparison. The SRT-10 isn't among them.
I tried to figure out why. It looks as though 0-60 was the order for the cars as the 1/4 mile and trap speed were all over the place. The slowest car on the list (by 0-60) was the GT-2 Porsche. Hmmm. On page 158 they list the SRT-10's 0-60 time as 3.9. OK, so it's even. What would YOU use as a tie-breaker? How about 1/4 mile? The SRT-10 is 11.8 @ 123, the GT-2 is 12.1 at 116. SO, in MTs' wisdom, they include the Porsche, even though the Viper is quicker than 4 other top cars on the list (Diablo VT 6.0, Mucielago, 911 turboS, and CL65 AMG)
The only faster cars on the list are the Enzo, Carrera GT, Saleen S7, and Ford GT.
Bias? or Brain fart? You decide.
In the mag there's an article on the SLR McLaren. Cool. In a sidebar, they list the 'fastest' cars as a comparison. The SRT-10 isn't among them.
I tried to figure out why. It looks as though 0-60 was the order for the cars as the 1/4 mile and trap speed were all over the place. The slowest car on the list (by 0-60) was the GT-2 Porsche. Hmmm. On page 158 they list the SRT-10's 0-60 time as 3.9. OK, so it's even. What would YOU use as a tie-breaker? How about 1/4 mile? The SRT-10 is 11.8 @ 123, the GT-2 is 12.1 at 116. SO, in MTs' wisdom, they include the Porsche, even though the Viper is quicker than 4 other top cars on the list (Diablo VT 6.0, Mucielago, 911 turboS, and CL65 AMG)
The only faster cars on the list are the Enzo, Carrera GT, Saleen S7, and Ford GT.
Bias? or Brain fart? You decide.