It is, of course, your decision if you choose for your engine to **** in this hot underhood air with one of these over the counter or "custom" kits.
However, these things are not good for our superchargers and we not only don't recommend them, we are warning against the use of them. Look at
the facts. 10° of hotter air is equivalent to 1 psi of boost. That means the difference between the fenderwell ambient 70° system and the hot underhood
air temp can be an amazing 130° (200°-70°=130°) hotter. That 130° equates to about 13 psi of additional boost (13x10°=130°). So, you thought your
engine was only seeing the increased temperature of 100° from 10 psi boost (10x10°=100°). Wrong. It's 100°+130° or 230° plus the ambient. That's
the air temp of 23 psi boost! Surprised?Are you getting the picture yet?
I remember reading in a DC Newsletter that the NACA duct by itself is insufficient to supply all the air requirements so access to air at the bottom in front of the radiator is necessary , like the Henn open front that can pull from both NACA and front of radiator is necessary to ensure adequate air flow a higher RPM's.
I have seen tests of WS6/Ram Air Firebirds that clearly reveal the Larger twin scoops of the WS6 cannot supply enough air for a 5.7 Litre.
does teh k&n box or the PBJ box seal to the hood 100% ?
does teh k&n box or the PBJ box seal to the hood 100% ?
K&N box does, that is one reason I choose it. I talked with Dan Cragin, and the the trick for enough air is to have both the NACA duct (which I added to my hood) and a system to get the air over the top of the radiator, which I had added too. As for the underhood hot air, that is why I plan to put reflective heat shielding on the outside of the box AND between the radiator and the piece routing the cool air from the fascia.
As for "straigtening out the intake" I plan to make tubes shaped more like the those pictured in the red air box pictured... without the very pronounced "S" beond of the ones on the K&N.
If you find tubes to use for the k&n please let me know- I have the same setup and want to put less restrictive tubes on mine also.
Thanks
Gary
As for "straigtening out the intake" I plan to make tubes shaped more like the those pictured in the red air box pictured... without the very pronounced "S" beond of the ones on the K&N.
I've done my share of designing intake manifolds, runners, etc.. so bear with my opinions, I'm just sharing some past knowledge I've learned in engineering stuff from others, don't let me sound like some kind of dorky ****..
What is the diameter of the pipes? For instance, in order for a 3" diameter pipe to have efficient airflow the inside corner of the pipe bend radius (side view) should be a minimum of 1.5 X the pipe radius. Therefore if the inside of the bend radius is equal or greater than 2 1/4" there is no problem (i.e. if you can roll a 4 1/2" diameter pipe inside that inside corner you are ok), nor will you gain a measurable performance advantage to be concerned about with a straight pipe changeover. Bends aren't typically a concern if the if the minimum bend radius is ok, another factor is a change in the diameter along the length, such as the convoluted pipe, or bending a flexible pipe (why mandrel bent exhaust is better). This variable cross section diameter creates changes in pressure, creating turbulance, affecting velocity.
It's just an effort to save you the hassle if you are concerned about performance, but if you prefer the cosmetic appearance and just want to do it, always feel free to ignore my comments..