OK (I cool off fast) let's talk advantages and disavantages of the various options. There's something to be said for each.
Normally Aspirated:
Plusses: The "traditional" route, most real-world experience with longevity of mods, most appropriate for roadracing, most tuners offering packages, predictable powerband works well on the street, lack of externally-visible modifications make it easiest to get past smog police.
Minuses: Lowest power limits, most expensive per HP gained, usually louder and higher-emissions than other options at similar power level.
NOS:
Plusses: Least expensive per HP gained, highest torque, best for drag racing applications, not sensitive to outside air temp or altitude.
Minuses: Most stressful on engine (high torque), need to refill bottle regularly, most susceptible to engine-damaging malfunctions (stuck solenoid, NOS backfire, lean conditions), hard to use in bracket racing (variable power levels) and on street (high torque = wheelspin).
Supercharging:
Plusses: Higher power levels than available through NA, predictable powerband is easy to use on street, S/C whine under Viper hood impresses bystanders.
Minuses: mechanically more complex than N/A, heat buildup from air compression and parasitic drag leads to heat soak, poor choice for roadracing, ultimate power limits lower than turbocharging, proven systems offered by few vendors, S/C whine under Viper hood scares off potential street-racing victims
Turbocharging:
Plusses: Highest theoretical power output, no parasitic drag, BOV sound from under Viper hood awes bystanders.
Minuses: system complexity and expense, very few vendors and very few examples on the road, turbo lag reduces driveability on the street.