You are correct, but this thread is about an accident involving a Viper and dead people in the car the Viper hit, not your **** fantasies.
i think the big 10 cylinder did the prius in, not the heels
You are correct, but this thread is about an accident involving a Viper and dead people in the car the Viper hit, not your **** fantasies.
Totally agree, they should be kept for walking around the bedroomMeanwhile, high heels are stupid for walking let alone operating something with pedals.
As a Prius (wife's) and Viper (mine) owner, I will be interested to hear more about this once the police report is available. As George mentioned, the passenger compartment looks fairly intact. This is very concerning to me.
Thoughts and prayers to both families of those involved in the accident and may the couple RIP.
High heels are the real killer here. I think we need the Democrats to look into this.
Tough crowd here - but,You were told she was wearing high heels and you felt compelled to tell us. I feel that is a green light for me to respond to that. If it turns out what you were told was incorrect and you tell us something else you were told that makes my categorizing her as a stupid idiot as malicious or mean on my part, I will post an apology. Meanwhile, high heels are stupid for walking let alone operating something with pedals.
maybe she took off her shoes to drive when she got in the car ? i know i have done this many times with my flip flops.
Nobody carries enough auto insurance limit to cover two fatalities. Bigger limits if the driver is a rich guy with umbrella coverage that kicks in, but this situation is most assuredly going to underinsured motorist coverage and if so, good luck to the family of the deceased as insurance carriers regularly flirt with bad faith on underinsured coverage (of course if they were elderly as reported above, and had no positive impact on the finances of their survivors, the sad reality is that their deaths will not be worth much to the eyes of insurance). That said, what is really sad to me is that the legal framework in the USofA regarding driving means that the Viper driver will suffer no consequences whatsoever from her deeds. Civily sure, but she will not be in any trouble for what she did criminally. BUT, if she had a glass of wine with dinner, the someone ran into HER, it would be her fault and she would be in sever criminal trouble. We have it all confused in the legal system with it comes to driving.I would assume the Viper owner had the appropriate $$$ level of insurances and the car was registered and legal.
Nobody carries enough auto insurance limit to cover two fatalities. Bigger limits if the driver is a rich guy with umbrella coverage that kicks in, but this situation is most assuredly going to underinsured motorist coverage and if so, good luck to the family of the deceased as insurance carriers regularly flirt with bad faith on underinsured coverage (of course if they were elderly as reported above, and had no positive impact on the finances of their survivors, the sad reality is that their deaths will not be worth much to the eyes of insurance). That said, what is really sad to me is that the legal framework in the USofA regarding driving means that the Viper driver will suffer no consequences whatsoever from her deeds. Civily sure, but she will not be in any trouble for what she did criminally. BUT, if she had a glass of wine with dinner, the someone ran into HER, it would be her fault and she would be in sever criminal trouble. We have it all confused in the legal system with it comes to driving.
PhoenixGTS, Esq.
It is not uncommon for people who leave the car wash and who go south to step on it a bit. However, I have no idea whether that happened in this case. If I had to guess, I would theorize that there may have been some pedal confusion. It is not hard to inadvertantly hit the gas while hiting the brake pedal in a Gen III or Gen IV. I have done that with the edge of my foot more than once but I always catch it immediately. However, because of the adaptives and the electronic throttle in a Gen IV, the result of that kind of mistake can be far more dramatic and abrupt.
That is a tremendous amount of speculation derived from absolutely no known facts.
How come in every instance of a (male) Viper driver involved in an accident people here are always rushing to the drivers defense (it was a deer, it was a wet road, it was the tires).
But in this case with no facts except she was at the car wash and allegedly had high heels on (or off) she was totally at fault and guilty.
Maybe someone cut here off.
Who said she had the shoes on? Maybe she had to avoid something.
If it was a male it would have been a deer's fault?