SCT Phase II

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,486
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
A little more insight into the SCT programmer. About five years ago I installed heads, injectors and a VEC2. The car ran good at wot, but, had several issues from idle through part throttle. This always bothered me, but, no matter how I tuned with the VEC i could not get rid of the problems.

Last year I weaned the car off of the wot settings and the timing. I also changed some of the inherent delays built into the PCM, after this the part throttle operation improved dramatically. I still was using the VEC for the injector offset. Personally, I believe this is the biggest problem with the VEC. It is too slow and it fights the closed loop operation, therefore, causing a jerky transition at certain rpm/map values.

This weekend I used the SCT package to control the offset for the 50 lb injectors. The VEC is not being used for anything at this time. The difference is huge, the part throttle operation is like a new stock car. All the part throttle issues are gone, it never was the performance modifications that caused the problems it was the VEC. My guess is that a lot of the problem was associated with the way the VEC controls the injector offset and the problem would not be as much of an issue if the VEC was not controlling this function.

This is not meant to condemn the VEC, there was no other simple fix prior to its inception. It has helped a lot of cars make some nice hp. At this time though the SCT package is way too easy and virtually controls all aspects of the PCM.

As a sidebar, Dan form Viper Specialties is a great resource if you have questions on the SCT system.
 

Twister

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Posts
3,140
Reaction score
1
I have a aem on my nsx and had an aem on my 99 rt10 and honestly the sct on my 2003 srt10 is just blowing my mind.....I got mine from Dan at viper specialty and it's just his "canned " tune..

The car is NOTICEBLY faster..idles better..less jerky at low rpm..Much better gas mileage and the exhaust sounds nicer...

As far as raw speed..I raced my friends 500 rwhp C6Z06 a few weeks ago and he beat me by 1-2 cars....After installing the sct we raced again and the cars were 100% dead even...

Too me picking up 1-2 carlengths is pretty huge...I love my sct!!!
 

BOTTLEFED

Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Posts
1,447
Reaction score
0
Location
Pocatello,ID
jack b,
I'm glad you finally got the offset worked out. It was kind of holding me back from going SCT, but now I think I'll take the plunge this summer and attempt to learn the programming.
thanks
 
OP
OP
J

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,486
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
jack b,
I'm glad you finally got the offset worked out. It was kind of holding me back from going SCT, but now I think I'll take the plunge this summer and attempt to learn the programming.
thanks


The program not only creates a better running car, but, it teaches you what the basics of the PCM are. All of the base a/f and timing parameters are naked to the eye.

The Palmer OBD scan tool package (inexpensive) also allows you to use 3 dimensional tables to build/modify your injector pulse width tables. As an example, my car is approx 530-540 NA and the stock injector base table was very lean at low vacuum and right on during high vacuum. In affect, the PCM was always fighting the fuel adaptives as they range in closed loop, therefore, a drive-ability issue.

In SCT you can lock out the long term adaptives and log/table the short term adaptives in the Palmer OBD software. This gives you an exact record of where your injector pulse width is not accurate. In my case the short term adaptives were in the 15-25% range as you approach low vacuum in closed loop.

IMHO Dan from Viper Specialties is the best resource for these two products.
 
Top