Re: RALPH NADER vs. VIPAIR
I am still gonna have to disagree with you on that as well....respectfully. Since DC did not balance/blueprint these cars in any year, they will still yield different numbers based on inherient variances in the powertrain. I am sure I can find a couple of graphs where people put Corsa on their 96's and some may have gotten 20+ and some did not. But then we get into how was the car tested, what conditions and all that.
So my entire point is why should anyone believe any one test and not the other. In this case specifically, you dyno over the 2 other that have been done.
I agree, my official tittle is demiGod however when the group of cars are ALL vipers the response from mods should be identical.
That's a pretty bold statement....so let us say we have a 96 GTS and my 01 RT. We both put CORSA, headers, and remove the cats. By your statement our gains should be "identical" if I am reading your post correctly....Mr. demiGOD.
Should be fairly obvious to you that I mean identical cars. Since 96's and 01's have different cams/pistons obviously the power results will be different.
I am still gonna have to disagree with you on that as well....respectfully. Since DC did not balance/blueprint these cars in any year, they will still yield different numbers based on inherient variances in the powertrain. I am sure I can find a couple of graphs where people put Corsa on their 96's and some may have gotten 20+ and some did not. But then we get into how was the car tested, what conditions and all that.
So my entire point is why should anyone believe any one test and not the other. In this case specifically, you dyno over the 2 other that have been done.