vipergtspa
Viper Owner
...and ?
Simms is in my area and was just wondering if that was the same one I raced a few weeks back because not to many people in this area drive cars like that.
...and ?
Simms is in my area and was just wondering if that was the same one I raced a few weeks back because not to many people in this area drive cars like that.
I know it wasn't that car in my picture, but there were 3 grabber blue GT500's at the Wexford show last weekend. Could have been one of those.
I'll call you in regard to this Friday. So far it will be my TT GTS, a TT RT/10, a TT C6, and possibly some other local vipers.
I have a 1996 RT and a 2008 GT500 convertible.... in stock form the Viper beats the GT500...with $1000 in mods....the GT500 beats the Viper.......the GT500 engine and supercharger are easily improved with minimal mods. They are both
fun cars for different reasons.
Yeah, that's a track car."The 2011 GT500 managed to lap the track in 2:58.5 -- a full nine seconds faster than last year's version.”
More like 7.4 seconds quicker, not 9.
"Shelby GT500 3.05.9 (LL2, 2007)"
-Car+Driver, Feb 2010, page 53.
Still impressive, faster slightly than the much vaunted mid-engined Audi R8 5.2 RSI, (huh?) slightly faster than the "mighty" Nissan GTR, (what?) and only 0.9 seconds slower than a 2007 SRT 10 Coupe.(Wha?) That's not much of a difference over a 4.1 mile circuit. Could this be true? If so, it might do about maybe 7:30-7:35 on the Ring. Doesn't seem like that simple American hunk of iron could do quite this well. How much can you expect from a solid rear axle? Let's see some results from other tests. But hey, if they've spiced up the Mustang to the point where they could be taken seriously as a real sports car, then hooray for them and the American spirit.
Yeah, that's a track car.
C&D Lightning Laps @ VIR. . .
Viper ACR 2:48.6
ZR1 2:51.8
GTR 2:55.6
Z06 2:58.2
New GT500 2:58.5
Nick
And a good percentage of them are modded. Around here there are tons of them with more than $1000 in mods too...
I'm willing to bet the modded ones are driven hard and often. Don't take any car for granted if you are stock but definitely not the mustangs.
yes it is just a matter of time before a 30K mustang will touch 1996-2002 GTS performance..
the stock mustang recently went 12.7 at 112 mph in a magazine and 109-111 mph in several others. As well a personal owner touched 115 mph in a stock auto mustang at sacremento..
Dont get me wrong a 12.7 at 112 would be a horrible time for a GTS..but I have seen reviews of GTS running 12.6 at 115 mph at the slowest..
2-3 years from now a 460HP 30K base mustang will be a force to reckon with
considering a base mustang is a V6 i highly doubt it will EVER be a force to reckon with.
and if your talking about the GT... I think its still unlikely with the increasing safty&emmision regulations.
i agree, i burned out on them years ago....
you just have to say if you ever see me cruising around NNJ (when i dont have my stripes on) that we should run ....
I went at one here recently in my Jeep SRT-8. UI was shocked at how slow the GT500 was off the line... and easily jumped out close t o5 cars on him. He ended up pulling me in a little towards the end but I still had him by a car. For that kind of money... I am not impressed.