0-100-0

Fiorano

Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 5, 2001
Posts
538
Reaction score
0
Location
Vienna, VA
Two recent car mags (R&T 8/03 and Autocar 7/30/03) both highlight 0-100-0 times. It is stated in R&T that the 96 viper did it in 15.0 sec and the SRT-10 was tested at 13.9.

Anyone have any results or guesses on a SC viper (Heffner, DLM, Roe, etc) with a set of stoptechs or better would get?

Other results:
Enzo 11.7 (R&T)
Pagani Zonda 11.84 (AC)
Murcielago 13.9, 14.2 (R&T, AC)
Saleen S7 14.3 (R&T)
 

Y2K5SRT

Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 26, 1999
Posts
7,891
Reaction score
0
Location
Overland Park, KS
Motor Trend, May (?) 2003, Viper SRT-10, 0-100-0 (note the Mosler is neither a production car yet OR street legal...)

You must be registered for see images


Gotta love 'dem Vipers!
 

Snakester

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 4, 2001
Posts
1,775
Reaction score
0
Location
Morgan Hill
To be wholly accurate, you need to add 3 tenths of a second to the Motor Trend times to include the transition time between acceleration and deceleration.

R&T errors the other way, with the driver reacting to when he sees 100MPH on the speedo and then braking. Therefore their transition time varied between 0.5 sec and 0.9 sec.
Realistically, they should have averaged all of the transition times to make things fair because the transition time has nothing to do with the performance of the car, but the attentiveness of the driver. The SRT-10 driver hit 103MPH before he started braking. That combined with the lousy 9.2 sec 0-100 time (Motor Trend got there in 8.36 seconds with the SRT-10 Viper), assured that the $135K X50 equipped Porsche won the comparison.

Also conveniently, they separated the cars into 1-to-1 comparisons, so it didn't show that the Viper got better 0-100-0 times than the $300K Murcielago and $400K Saleen S7.

Road & Track themselves ran an 8.8 second 0-100 time with the GTS previously. If they had at least matched that time then the SRT-10 Viper would have won over the X50/911TT, and if they had averaged the transition times, then the Lambo and S7's performance would have been much closer as well.

Even allowing for different weather and track conditions, I find it amazing that the R&T times for the SRT-10 Viper are more than 1.5 seconds slower than the MT times.

And it's VERY impressive that the MT SRT-10 Viper 0-100-0 test times are surprisingly close to the $$$ Ferrari Enzo, and the Viper's braking was the same as the Enzo (even with it's cool $20K ceramic brakes)!

Also the Mosler in the MT test was wearing Hoosier racing tires! Which the MT writers somehow found no problem with, against all the other cars in full street/smog-legal trim.
Beyond throwing a full-racecar into this mix of street performance cars, the slicks added a definite extra edge to the Mosler. Car & Driver's recent SuperTuner test (which deserved to include the Mosler Proton) they stipulated that all cars needed to run regular street tires, and the Mosler hit 60MPH in a more reasonable 4.0 sec, 100MPH in 7.7 (still fast), and the 1/4 mile at 11.9@127MPH. The racecar Proton would still have beat the Viper, but the difference would have been closer to a half second without the slicks.

-Dean.
 

dansauto

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 30, 2001
Posts
939
Reaction score
0
Location
gillett, pa, usa
got this issuse. I have noticed R&T is extremely pro Porshe. They must have a big advertising contract with them.
 

Viperzilla

Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Posts
1,424
Reaction score
0
Location
Annapolis, MD
Great, R&T is pro-Porsche, MT is pro-Vette. :rolleyes: I can't personally vouch for R&T being pro-Porsche, but if it leans that way...
 

Heysie

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 11, 2003
Posts
239
Reaction score
10
Location
Vianen, The Netherlands
The Caterham Superlight R500 (streetcar) does 0-100 in 7.26 and 100-0 in 3.99. Total 11.25 seconds. This is 0.19 seconds faster than the McLaren F1 Streetcar.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
153,645
Posts
1,685,215
Members
18,221
Latest member
tractor1996
Top