ViperSmith
Enthusiast
The fact that you would not own nor even consider an earlier Viper proves unequivocally that you certainly do not get what it means to own a "Viper". The soul of the car is what *IS* lost when force-feeding comfort at the expense of performance. The Gen-5 performs, yes... BARELY better than its predecessors, and not up to the past-set bar in some respects, with 7 years more development. It boasts a higher price tag and more comforts. A true Viper approach would be all-out performance, and whatever is left over goes towards comfort. THAT is what it means to be a Viper owner... or at least it used to. If this new car was a 750HP street GTS-R at 100K base with 50K in comfort upgrades as a "SRT/GTS" package layout, we would not be having this conversation.
The thing is, that ALL of the newer Chrysler products have really nice interiors and all of these comforts and then some. The Viper BETTER have them as well considering that SRT tacked on an upcharge that could nearly swallow a new 300 SRT8 just for these "comforts" alone, which also includes all of the same and then some! Something is wrong with the "Viper" picture when you can add 50K+ for electronics, seats, colors, carbon, brakes, and wheels... and the car didnt actually get any faster to speak of or more powerful in the process. You are not better than anyone else because you got more comfort for the price of a second car.
Don't get me wrong, I am all for certain technologies. I have been known to push the limits of tech on everything I can get my developmental hands into, and at spare no expense price points at that. However, I would never slight those with less technology simply because they choose not to have it, and that is because I get what it means to own a Viper.
Chrysler could only move so many Vipers with the "bare bones" interior of previous generations. Perhaps that is why it died in 2010. The die hards, god bless them, can't keep a single model alive in sales.
The market simply demands more luxuries. Just viewing this site it has pulled plenty more into the fold, it has seemingly worked so far. Time will tell if it does overall.
Marginally faster than the Gen IV - sure. But much better overall in the inside I think most can attest to.
I'd venture to guess SRT did the market research that dictated people would much rather have their interior options to tack on rather than performance options. Investment simply follows the cash. If there was such demand for the bare bones, there are still unsold Gen IV sitting on lots unsold, so - why is that the case?